Get the briefing by email: when the forecast moves and weekly through Election Day, then how our forecast did. See one

Explore 2026 in charts

This election's forecasts, polls and money, drawn from the newest published forecast and the poll and money records behind it. Each chart says what date its data is as of. Link to it, embed its image, or take its numbers.

Also: The chart library: elections past

  1. A Hundred Novembers
  2. Every Forecast House Race in One Picture
  3. Where the Toss-Ups Went
  4. The Fog of the Forecast
  5. The Seat Ridges
  6. Why the Forecasts Moved
  7. Who Polls the Close Races
  8. Outside Money
  9. The Closest Senate Races, Week by Week
  10. The Polling Calendar
  11. The Poll Stream
  12. Senate Horizon Strips
  13. The Senate Money Map

Forecast · Senate and governors

A Hundred Novembers

In twelve of the twenty-four closest Senate and governor races, the trailing candidate wins at least one November in four

Each square of a hundred dots is one race's forecast chance, counted out: a 70% chance is seventy dots in the favourite's colour and thirty in the other candidate's. Those thirty are Novembers the forecast thinks can really happen, not errors.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

DemocratRepublicanIndependentIA Senate: Hinson (R) wins 52 in 100, Turek (D) 48 in 100IA SenateHinson (R) 52 in 100Turek (D) 48 in 100middle margin +0.3KS Senate: Hamilton (D) wins 53 in 100, Marshall (R) 47 in 100KS SenateHamilton (D) 53 in 100Marshall (R) 47 in 100middle margin +0.4NV Governor: Lombardo (R) wins 54 in 100, Ford (D) 46 in 100NV GovernorLombardo (R) 54 in 100Ford (D) 46 in 100middle margin +0.5NE Senate: Ricketts (R) wins 57 in 100, Osborn (I) 43 in 100NE SenateRicketts (R) 57 in 100Osborn (I) 43 in 100middle margin +0.8AK Senate: Peltola (D) wins 57 in 100, Sullivan (R) 43 in 100AK SenatePeltola (D) 57 in 100Sullivan (R) 43 in 100middle margin +1.4KS Governor: Masterson (R) wins 61 in 100, Holscher (D) 39 in 100KS GovernorMasterson (R) 61 in 100Holscher (D) 39 in 100middle margin +1.5GA Governor: Bottoms (D) wins 62 in 100, Jackson (R) 38 in 100GA GovernorBottoms (D) 62 in 100Jackson (R) 38 in 100middle margin +1.5ME Senate: Jackson (D) wins 66 in 100, Collins (R) 34 in 100ME SenateJackson (D) 66 in 100Collins (R) 34 in 100middle margin +1.9TX Senate: Talarico (D) wins 68 in 100, Paxton (R) 32 in 100TX SenateTalarico (D) 68 in 100Paxton (R) 32 in 100middle margin +2.2SC Senate: Graham (R) wins 72 in 100, Andrews (D) 28 in 100SC SenateGraham (R) 72 in 100Andrews (D) 28 in 100middle margin +3.0OH Senate: Brown (D) wins 73 in 100, Husted (R) 27 in 100OH SenateBrown (D) 73 in 100Husted (R) 27 in 100middle margin +3.0TX Governor: Abbott (R) wins 73 in 100, Hinojosa (D) 27 in 100TX GovernorAbbott (R) 73 in 100Hinojosa (D) 27 in 100middle margin +3.1OH Governor: Acton (D) wins 77 in 100, Ramaswamy (R) 23 in 100OH GovernorActon (D) 77 in 100Ramaswamy (R) 23 in 100middle margin +3.7FL Governor: Donalds (R) wins 77 in 100, Jolly (D) 23 in 100FL GovernorDonalds (R) 77 in 100Jolly (D) 23 in 100middle margin +3.6WI Governor: Crowley (D) wins 78 in 100, Tiffany (R) 22 in 100WI GovernorCrowley (D) 78 in 100Tiffany (R) 22 in 100middle margin +3.9MI Senate: El-Sayed (D) wins 80 in 100, Rogers (R) 20 in 100MI SenateEl-Sayed (D) 80 in 100Rogers (R) 20 in 100middle margin +4.2OR Governor: Kotek (D) wins 84 in 100, Drazan (R) 16 in 100OR GovernorKotek (D) 84 in 100Drazan (R) 16 in 100middle margin +5.4OK Governor: Mazzei (R) wins 84 in 100, Munson (D) 16 in 100OK GovernorMazzei (R) 84 in 100Munson (D) 16 in 100middle margin +8.9NE Governor: Pillen (R) wins 85 in 100, Walz (D) 15 in 100NE GovernorPillen (R) 85 in 100Walz (D) 15 in 100middle margin +5.5IA Governor: Sand (D) wins 86 in 100, Lahn (R) 14 in 100IA GovernorSand (D) 86 in 100Lahn (R) 14 in 100middle margin +5.6FL Senate: Moody (R) wins 86 in 100, Nixon (D) 14 in 100FL SenateMoody (R) 86 in 100Nixon (D) 14 in 100middle margin +5.7LA Senate: Letlow (R) wins 88 in 100, Davis (D) 12 in 100LA SenateLetlow (R) 88 in 100Davis (D) 12 in 100middle margin +10.3AK Governor: Kreiss-Tomkins (D) wins 89 in 100, Wilson (R) 11 in 100AK GovernorKreiss-Tomkins (D) 89 in 100Wilson (R) 11 in 100middle margin +9.6VT Governor: Scott (R) wins 91 in 100, Janoo (D) 9 in 100VT GovernorScott (R) 91 in 100Janoo (D) 9 in 100middle margin +8.3

How to read it. Read across: the more dots in the trailing candidate's colour, the closer the race. Races are ordered by the favourite's chance, lowest first.

Source. FutureBallot election-day forecast, newest published run per race. Races where the favourite's chance is 97% or more are left out. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Forecast · House

Every Forecast House Race in One Picture

The House in 412 forecast districts: a 60% chance or better for Democrats in 207, for Republicans in 187; eighteen toss-ups below that

Every House district with a published forecast between two named candidates (412 of 435; the rest are not drawn), as one dot placed at its middle margin, except those beyond fifty points either way, which are counted at the edges. Dots pile up where districts crowd together; the darker a dot, the surer the forecast. The shaded strip holds the districts within five points.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

DemocratRepublicanSolid dot: likely or safeFaint dot: toss-up or leanWA-3: Perez (D) 52%, middle margin 0.2IA-2: Mitchell (R) 52%, middle margin 0.4MI-10: Bouchard (R) 52%, middle margin 0.4NY-17: Lawler (R) 53%, middle margin 0.4TX-35: De La Cruz (R) 53%, middle margin 0.5CA-22: Valadao (R) 54%, middle margin 0.6VA-1: Taylor (D) 55%, middle margin 0.6PA-8: Cognetti (D) 55%, middle margin 0.7MT-1: Flint (R) 55%, middle margin 0.8MO-2: Wagner (R) 56%, middle margin 0.9WI-3: Cooke (D) 56%, middle margin 0.9KY-6: Dembo (D) 56%, middle margin 0.9FL-22: Dandiya (D) 57%, middle margin 0.9FL-9: Green (R) 57%, middle margin 1.0CO-5: Crank (R) 58%, middle margin 1.2MI-4: Huizenga (R) 59%, middle margin 1.2ME-2: LePage (R) 58%, middle margin 1.3MI-7: Lawrence (D) 60%, middle margin 1.4VA-2: Luria (D) 62%, middle margin 1.6NV-2: Flippo (R) 61%, middle margin 1.7OH-15: Carey (R) 62%, middle margin 1.8TX-15: Pulido (D) 63%, middle margin 1.9AZ-6: Mendoza (D) 64%, middle margin 2.0AL-2: Marques (R) 64%, middle margin 2.0CO-8: Rutinel (D) 65%, middle margin 2.2PA-10: Stelson (D) 67%, middle margin 2.4SC-1: Honeycutt (R) 66%, middle margin 2.6NJ-7: Bennett (D) 68%, middle margin 2.6AZ-1: Shah (D) 69%, middle margin 3.0PA-7: Brooks (D) 71%, middle margin 3.1FL-7: Dalton (D) 71%, middle margin 3.2PA-1: Fitzpatrick (R) 72%, middle margin 3.3IA-1: Bohannan (D) 74%, middle margin 3.5FL-13: Luna (R) 73%, middle margin 3.6MN-1: Finstad (R) 74%, middle margin 3.6TX-34: Gonzalez (D) 74%, middle margin 3.7IA-3: Garriott (D) 76%, middle margin 3.8AK-AL: Begich (R) 70%, middle margin 3.9CO-3: Hurd (R) 77%, middle margin 4.0AR-2: Hill (R) 77%, middle margin 4.1AZ-2: Crane (R) 78%, middle margin 4.2NY-21: Constantino (R) 75%, middle margin 4.2TX-28: Cuellar (D) 76%, middle margin 4.3TX-23: Herrera (R) 78%, middle margin 4.5WI-1: Steil (R) 79%, middle margin 4.5IN-5: Spartz (R) 80%, middle margin 4.5FL-16: Gruters (R) 79%, middle margin 4.6NC-3: Murphy (R) 80%, middle margin 4.9FL-25: Moskowitz (D) 80%, middle margin 5.0NM-2: Vasquez (D) 82%, middle margin 5.0VA-5: McGuire (R) 83%, middle margin 5.3OH-9: Kaptur (D) 84%, middle margin 5.7NE-1: Flood (R) 85%, middle margin 5.9CA-48: von Wilpert (D) 85%, middle margin 6.0FL-14: Castor (D) 85%, middle margin 6.0OH-7: Poindexter (D) 85%, middle margin 6.1NC-1: Davis (D) 85%, middle margin 6.1NY-1: LaLota (R) 87%, middle margin 6.2FL-27: Salazar (R) 86%, middle margin 6.3NH-1: Shaheen (D) 84%, middle margin 6.4NC-11: Ager (D) 88%, middle margin 6.7NC-9: Hudson (R) 88%, middle margin 7.0TN-5: Hatcher (R) 90%, middle margin 7.7OH-1: Landsman (D) 90%, middle margin 7.7OH-10: Turner (R) 92%, middle margin 8.5NC-5: Foxx (R) 92%, middle margin 8.6NE-2: Powell (D) 91%, middle margin 8.7NC-13: Knott (R) 93%, middle margin 8.7FL-11: Strada (R) 93%, middle margin 8.8CA-6: Pan (D) 88%, middle margin 8.9TN-9: Taylor (R) 93%, middle margin 9.0WA-5: Baumgartner (R) 94%, middle margin 9.0CO-4: Boebert (R) 94%, middle margin 9.1GA-7: McCormick (R) 94%, middle margin 9.3MN-2: Little (D) 92%, middle margin 9.3FL-2: Rogers (R) 94%, middle margin 9.4NC-14: Moore (R) 94%, middle margin 9.4NC-7: Rouzer (R) 94%, middle margin 9.5GA-1: Kingston (R) 93%, middle margin 9.6SC-2: Wilson (R) 95%, middle margin 9.7TX-32: Yarbrough (R) 94%, middle margin 9.8OH-8: Davidson (R) 95%, middle margin 9.8AZ-8: Hamadeh (R) 96%, middle margin 9.9TX-9: Mealer (R) 95%, middle margin 10.0NJ-2: Van Drew (R) 96%, middle margin 10.5MN-8: Stauber (R) 96%, middle margin 10.6FL-4: Bean (R) 96%, middle margin 10.6NC-6: McDowell (R) 96%, middle margin 10.7NY-3: Suozzi (D) 96%, middle margin 10.8OK-5: Bice (R) 97%, middle margin 10.9TX-24: Van Duyne (R) 96%, middle margin 11.1WI-6: Grothman (R) 97%, middle margin 11.2WI-8: Wied (R) 97%, middle margin 11.3MD-1: Harris (R) 97%, middle margin 11.4AZ-5: Lamb (R) 96%, middle margin 11.7KS-2: Schmidt (R) 97%, middle margin 11.9NC-10: Harrigan (R) 97%, middle margin 12.0GA-12: Allen (R) 98%, middle margin 12.1FL-8: Haridopolos (R) 97%, middle margin 12.2NV-3: Lee (D) 98%, middle margin 12.6NC-8: Harris (R) 98%, middle margin 12.9FL-12: Bilirakis (R) 98%, middle margin 12.9NY-4: Gillen (D) 98%, middle margin 13.1GA-10: Gaines (R) 97%, middle margin 13.1NV-1: Titus (D) 98%, middle margin 13.1CA-13: Gray (D) 98%, middle margin 13.4TX-38: Bonck (R) 98%, middle margin 13.4TX-31: Carter (R) 98%, middle margin 13.4FL-18: Franklin (R) 98%, middle margin 13.4TX-10: Gober (R) 98%, middle margin 13.8FL-3: Cammack (R) 99%, middle margin 13.8FL-5: Rutherford (R) 98%, middle margin 14.0NY-2: Garbarino (R) 99%, middle margin 14.1CA-5: McClintock (R) 98%, middle margin 14.2CA-45: Tran (D) 98%, middle margin 14.2TX-17: Sessions (R) 98%, middle margin 14.4WI-7: Alfonso (R) 98%, middle margin 14.4TX-21: Teixeira (R) 99%, middle margin 14.4FL-15: Lee (R) 99%, middle margin 14.5MN-6: Emmer (R) 99%, middle margin 14.6WA-4: McKinney (R) 98%, middle margin 14.6CT-5: Hayes (D) 99%, middle margin 14.6OK-1: Tedford (R) 98%, middle margin 14.7TX-5: Gooden (R) 98%, middle margin 14.7SC-7: Fry (R) >99%, middle margin 14.8NV-4: Horsford (D) 99%, middle margin 14.8MI-1: Bergman (R) 99%, middle margin 14.9TX-22: Nehls (R) 99%, middle margin 14.9OH-14: Joyce (R) 99%, middle margin 15.0FL-21: Mast (R) 99%, middle margin 15.1NY-18: Ryan (D) >99%, middle margin 15.1TX-2: Toth (R) 99%, middle margin 15.2UT-2: Moore (R) 99%, middle margin 15.4TX-27: Cloud (R) 99%, middle margin 15.5SC-4: Timmons (R) >99%, middle margin 15.5PA-11: Smucker (R) >99%, middle margin 15.6NM-3: Leger Fernández (D) >99%, middle margin 16.0CA-23: Obernolte (R) >99%, middle margin 16.2IN-1: Mrvan (D) >99%, middle margin 16.3TN-6: Garrett (R) 99%, middle margin 16.5TN-4: DesJarlais (R) >99%, middle margin 16.5TN-7: Van Epps (R) >99%, middle margin 16.6WI-5: Fitzgerald (R) >99%, middle margin 16.6NY-19: Riley (D) >99%, middle margin 16.7TX-6: Ellzey (R) >99%, middle margin 16.8RI-2: Magaziner (D) >99%, middle margin 16.9CA-1: McGuire (D) >99%, middle margin 17.0FL-17: Steube (R) >99%, middle margin 17.2TX-14: Weber (R) >99%, middle margin 17.3FL-26: Díaz-Balart (R) >99%, middle margin 17.4TX-25: Williams (R) >99%, middle margin 17.4TN-8: Kustoff (R) >99%, middle margin 17.5TX-4: Fallon (R) >99%, middle margin 17.5NJ-9: Pou (D) >99%, middle margin 17.6MI-8: Rivet (D) >99%, middle margin 17.6TX-3: Self (R) >99%, middle margin 17.6SC-5: Climer (R) 99%, middle margin 17.6TX-36: Babin (R) >99%, middle margin 17.7TX-8: Steinmann (R) >99%, middle margin 17.8CA-21: Costa (D) >99%, middle margin 17.8TX-12: Goldman (R) >99%, middle margin 18.0OH-5: Latta (R) >99%, middle margin 18.1VA-7: Vindman (D) >99%, middle margin 18.1TX-26: Gill (R) >99%, middle margin 18.3IL-16: LaHood (R) >99%, middle margin 18.3UT-4: Kennedy (R) >99%, middle margin 18.3OR-2: Bentz (R) >99%, middle margin 18.5KS-4: Estes (R) >99%, middle margin 18.5GA-11: Cowan (R) >99%, middle margin 18.5NY-11: Malliotakis (R) >99%, middle margin 18.8NH-2: Goodlander (D) >99%, middle margin 18.8OH-13: Sykes (D) >99%, middle margin 19.0IA-4: McGowan (R) >99%, middle margin 19.1PA-16: Kelly (R) >99%, middle margin 19.1MO-3: Onder (R) >99%, middle margin 19.1VA-10: Subramanyam (D) >99%, middle margin 19.4AR-3: Womack (R) >99%, middle margin 19.4IN-2: Yakym (R) >99%, middle margin 19.5NY-23: Langworthy (R) >99%, middle margin 19.8CA-25: Ruiz (D) >99%, middle margin 19.9MT-2: Downing (R) >99%, middle margin 19.9CA-41: Sánchez (D) >99%, middle margin 20.0OR-5: Bynum (D) >99%, middle margin 20.2CA-35: Torres (D) >99%, middle margin 20.2NY-24: Tenney (R) >99%, middle margin 20.3IL-14: Underwood (D) >99%, middle margin 20.4NM-1: Stansbury (D) >99%, middle margin 20.5IL-11: Foster (D) >99%, middle margin 20.6MD-6: Delaney (D) >99%, middle margin 20.8WA-8: Schrier (D) >99%, middle margin 20.9CA-39: Takano (D) >99%, middle margin 21.0OR-6: Salinas (D) >99%, middle margin 21.1MI-5: Walberg (R) >99%, middle margin 21.2OR-4: Hoyle (D) >99%, middle margin 21.4NJ-5: Gottheimer (D) >99%, middle margin 21.5AZ-4: Stanton (D) >99%, middle margin 21.5AL-5: Strong (R) >99%, middle margin 21.5SD-AL: Jackley (R) >99%, middle margin 21.5GA-2: Bishop (D) >99%, middle margin 21.6IN-6: Shreve (R) >99%, middle margin 21.6NJ-3: Conaway (D) >99%, middle margin 21.7CA-31: Cisneros (D) >99%, middle margin 21.7ID-2: Simpson (R) >99%, middle margin 21.8IL-6: Casten (D) >99%, middle margin 21.8IL-17: Sorensen (D) >99%, middle margin 21.9IL-8: Bean (D) >99%, middle margin 22.0MI-3: Scholten (D) >99%, middle margin 22.1CA-9: Harder (D) >99%, middle margin 22.3FL-28: Giménez (R) >99%, middle margin 22.5OH-12: Balderson (R) >99%, middle margin 22.5IN-3: Stutzman (R) >99%, middle margin 22.7PA-17: Deluzio (D) >99%, middle margin 22.7IN-4: Baird (R) >99%, middle margin 22.7CA-33: Aguilar (D) >99%, middle margin 22.8KS-3: Davids (D) >99%, middle margin 23.1GA-3: Jack (R) >99%, middle margin 23.3CA-38: Solis (D) >99%, middle margin 23.4NJ-6: Pallone (D) >99%, middle margin 23.4AZ-9: Gosar (R) >99%, middle margin 23.5IN-9: Houchin (R) >99%, middle margin 23.5OH-6: Rulli (R) >99%, middle margin 23.5CA-27: Whitesides (D) >99%, middle margin 23.6VA-6: Cline (R) >99%, middle margin 23.6PA-14: Reschenthaler (R) >99%, middle margin 23.6CA-42: Garcia (D) >99%, middle margin 23.8PA-6: Houlahan (D) >99%, middle margin 23.8NY-22: Mannion (D) >99%, middle margin 23.9CA-20: Fong (R) >99%, middle margin 24.1NY-6: Meng (D) >99%, middle margin 24.1AL-6: Palmer (R) >99%, middle margin 24.3CA-49: Levin (D) >99%, middle margin 24.3CA-47: Min (D) >99%, middle margin 24.6FL-19: Schwartzel (R) >99%, middle margin 24.7MI-2: Moolenaar (R) >99%, middle margin 24.8CA-3: Bera (D) >99%, middle margin 24.8GA-14: Fuller (R) >99%, middle margin 24.9TX-11: Pfluger (R) >99%, middle margin 24.9FL-23: Frankel (D) >99%, middle margin 25.0FL-6: Fine (R) >99%, middle margin 25.3NJ-11: Mejia (D) >99%, middle margin 25.4GA-9: Clyde (R) >99%, middle margin 25.4NJ-4: Smith (R) >99%, middle margin 25.5TN-2: Burchett (R) >99%, middle margin 25.6KS-1: Mann (R) >99%, middle margin 25.6KY-4: Gallrein (R) >99%, middle margin 25.6GA-8: Scott (R) >99%, middle margin 26.0MS-3: Guest (R) >99%, middle margin 26.0TX-16: Escobar (D) >99%, middle margin 26.1CA-26: Irwin (D) >99%, middle margin 26.2MA-9: Keating (D) >99%, middle margin 26.2CT-3: DeLauro (D) >99%, middle margin 26.5RI-1: Amo (D) >99%, middle margin 26.6OK-4: Cole (R) >99%, middle margin 26.6IL-4: Garcia (D) >99%, middle margin 26.6AL-1: Carl (R) >99%, middle margin 26.7TN-3: Fleischmann (R) >99%, middle margin 26.8CA-46: Correa (D) >99%, middle margin 26.9UT-3: Maloy (R) >99%, middle margin 26.9CT-2: Courtney (D) >99%, middle margin 27.0DE-AL: McBride (D) >99%, middle margin 27.1ME-1: Pingree (D) >99%, middle margin 27.5IL-13: Budzinski (D) >99%, middle margin 27.8CO-7: Pettersen (D) >99%, middle margin 27.8MI-9: McClain (R) >99%, middle margin 27.8FL-1: Patronis (R) >99%, middle margin 28.1NY-20: Tonko (D) >99%, middle margin 28.1IN-8: Messmer (R) >99%, middle margin 28.5NJ-1: Norcross (D) >99%, middle margin 28.9CA-50: Peters (D) >99%, middle margin 29.4CA-51: Jacobs (D) >99%, middle margin 29.4PA-12: Lee (D) >99%, middle margin 29.4CA-52: Vargas (D) >99%, middle margin 29.4PA-4: Dean (D) >99%, middle margin 29.8MI-11: Moss (D) >99%, middle margin 30.0NJ-12: Hamawy (D) >99%, middle margin 30.1CO-6: Crow (D) >99%, middle margin 30.1WA-10: Strickland (D) >99%, middle margin 30.2IL-15: Miller (R) >99%, middle margin 30.2MN-7: Fischbach (R) >99%, middle margin 30.6PA-9: Meuser (R) >99%, middle margin 30.7OH-2: Taylor (R) >99%, middle margin 31.0MD-2: Olszewski (D) >99%, middle margin 31.0ND-AL: Fedorchak (R) >99%, middle margin 31.1WA-6: Randall (D) >99%, middle margin 31.1VT-AL: Balint (D) >99%, middle margin 31.2OH-4: Jordan (R) >99%, middle margin 31.3ID-1: Fulcher (R) >99%, middle margin 31.3WY-AL: Gray (R) >99%, middle margin 31.4IL-10: Schneider (D) >99%, middle margin 31.6PA-15: Thompson (R) >99%, middle margin 31.9NY-25: Morelle (D) >99%, middle margin 32.0AZ-7: Grijalva (D) >99%, middle margin 32.1MO-6: Stigall (R) >99%, middle margin 32.1KY-3: McGarvey (D) >99%, middle margin 32.5WV-2: Moore (R) >99%, middle margin 32.7AL-7: Sewell (D) >99%, middle margin 32.7CT-4: Himes (D) >99%, middle margin 32.7MO-7: Burlison (R) >99%, middle margin 32.8MA-3: Trahan (D) >99%, middle margin 32.8WV-1: Miller (R) >99%, middle margin 33.2MS-1: Kelly (R) >99%, middle margin 33.2CA-32: Sherman (D) >99%, middle margin 33.2TX-7: Fletcher (D) >99%, middle margin 33.3MA-4: Auchincloss (D) >99%, middle margin 33.7CA-24: Carbajal (D) >99%, middle margin 33.7CA-2: Huffman (D) >99%, middle margin 33.8MS-2: Thompson (D) >99%, middle margin 33.8MN-3: Morrison (D) >99%, middle margin 34.0SC-6: Clyburn (D) >99%, middle margin 34.0CA-28: Chu (D) >99%, middle margin 34.0MO-5: Cleaver (D) >99%, middle margin 34.2PA-13: Joyce (R) >99%, middle margin 34.3KY-2: Guthrie (R) 100%, middle margin 34.7MO-4: Alford (R) >99%, middle margin 34.7CT-1: Bronin (D) >99%, middle margin 34.7MD-3: Elfreth (D) >99%, middle margin 34.9TX-13: Jackson (R) >99%, middle margin 35.0SC-3: Biggs (R) >99%, middle margin 35.1VA-9: Griffith (R) >99%, middle margin 35.5NY-26: Kennedy (D) >99%, middle margin 35.6MA-6: Koh (D) >99%, middle margin 35.8OK-3: Lucas (R) >99%, middle margin 36.0MS-4: Ezell (R) >99%, middle margin 36.1AR-4: Westerman (R) >99%, middle margin 36.2WA-2: Larsen (D) >99%, middle margin 36.2MI-6: Dingell (D) >99%, middle margin 36.3CA-18: Lofgren (D) >99%, middle margin 36.4AL-3: Rogers (R) >99%, middle margin 36.7IL-12: Bost (R) >99%, middle margin 36.8UT-1: McAdams (D) >99%, middle margin 36.9HI-2: Tokuda (D) >99%, middle margin 37.9KY-1: Comer (R) >99%, middle margin 38.1AR-1: Crawford (R) >99%, middle margin 38.5TX-29: Garcia (D) >99%, middle margin 38.9TX-20: Castro (D) >99%, middle margin 39.1WA-1: DelBene (D) >99%, middle margin 39.2TX-1: Moran (R) >99%, middle margin 39.4HI-1: Case (D) >99%, middle margin 39.9MA-8: Lynch (D) >99%, middle margin 40.0PA-5: Scanlon (D) >99%, middle margin 40.4VA-11: Walkinshaw (D) >99%, middle margin 42.1TX-19: Sell (R) >99%, middle margin 42.1IL-1: Jackson (D) >99%, middle margin 42.1NY-14: Ocasio-Cortez (D) >99%, middle margin 42.4CA-10: DeSaulnier (D) >99%, middle margin 42.6IL-3: Ramirez (D) >99%, middle margin 42.8MN-4: McCollum (D) >99%, middle margin 43.5MD-5: Boafo (D) >99%, middle margin 43.7IL-2: Miller (D) >99%, middle margin 43.7CA-44: Barragán (D) >99%, middle margin 43.9OK-2: Brecheen (R) >99%, middle margin 43.9VA-4: McClellan (D) >99%, middle margin 44.0TN-1: Harshbarger (R) >99%, middle margin 44.2NY-16: Latimer (D) 100%, middle margin 44.3CA-19: Panetta (D) >99%, middle margin 44.3TX-33: Allred (D) >99%, middle margin 44.3IL-5: Quigley (D) >99%, middle margin 44.4FL-24: Gilbert (D) >99%, middle margin 44.5CA-8: Garamendi (D) >99%, middle margin 44.7IL-9: Biss (D) >99%, middle margin 44.8OR-1: Bonamici (D) 100%, middle margin 44.8NC-2: Ross (D) >99%, middle margin 45.0FL-20: Schultz (D) >99%, middle margin 45.2CA-36: Lieu (D) >99%, middle margin 45.7MO-8: Smith (R) >99%, middle margin 46.0VA-3: Scott (D) >99%, middle margin 46.2PA-2: Boyle (D) >99%, middle margin 47.3NE-3: Smith (R) >99%, middle margin 48.0IN-7: Carson (D) >99%, middle margin 48.3MI-12: Tlaib (D) >99%, middle margin 48.4CO-2: Neguse (D) >99%, middle margin 48.5GA-13: Clark (D) >99%, middle margin 49.1TX-30: Haynes (D) >99%, middle margin 49.3R+50R+40R+30R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20D+30D+40D+50races within five points shadedEach dot is one district+2 beyond R+50+37 beyond D+50

How to read it. Left of centre: Republican favoured; right: Democrat favoured. Faint dots are toss-ups or leaning races; solid ones are likely or safe. Districts beyond fifty points are counted at the edges.

Source. FutureBallot election-day House forecast, newest published run; districts with no contested forecast are not shown. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Forecast · Senate and governors

Where the Toss-Ups Went

Since September 24, ten races moved toward Democrats or independents and two toward Republicans

Every Senate and governor race that was anything but safe at some point, and how its rating changed at three moments of the season. Thirteen kept their rating. Ratings come from the favourite's chance: toss-up below 60%, lean from 60% to 84%, likely from 85% to 94%, and safe at 95% or more.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

Safe RLikely RLean RToss-upLean D/ILikely D/ISafe D/I1 race: Safe R → Likely R1 race: Likely R → Safe R1 race: Likely R → Likely R1 race: Likely R → Lean R4 races: Lean R → Lean R1 race: Lean R → Toss-up3 races: Toss-up → Lean D/I3 races: Lean D/I → Toss-up3 races: Lean D/I → Lean D/I2 races: Lean D/I → Likely D/I4 races: Likely D/I → Likely D/I1 race: Safe D/I → Likely D/I1 race: Safe R → Safe R2 races: Likely R → Likely R1 race: Lean R → Likely R3 races: Lean R → Lean R1 race: Lean R → Toss-up2 races: Toss-up → Toss-up2 races: Toss-up → Lean D/I6 races: Lean D/I → Lean D/I4 races: Likely D/I → Likely D/I3 races: Likely D/I → Safe D/ISafe R 1Likely R 3Lean R 5Toss-up 3Lean D/I 8Likely D/I 4Safe D/I 1September 24125467October 13Safe R 1Likely R 3Lean R 3Toss-up 3Lean D/I 8Likely D/I 4Safe D/I 3November 2

How to read it. Each ribbon is a group of races with one rating at one moment and one at the next, the same or different; the ribbon's thickness shows how many races are in it. Ribbons that cross are rating changes. Races safe at all three moments are left out.

Source. FutureBallot election-day forecasts: the newest published run on each date. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Forecast · Senate and governors

The Fog of the Forecast

In thirty-four of seventy-one Senate and governor races, either candidate can win inside the forecast's likely range

A forecast is a range, not a number. The pale band holds 90% of simulated results, the darker band the middle half, and the tick is the middle result. Wherever a band crosses the centre line, each colour is a way the race can end.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

DemocratRepublicanIndependentPale band: 90% of simulationsDark band: the middle halfTick: middle resultR+40R+30R+20R+10EvenD+10D+20D+30D+40← Republican or other aheadDemocrat or independent ahead →WY Senate: Byrd (D) vs Hageman (R); middle of the range Hageman+37.1; 90% of simulations between Hageman+58.0 and Hageman+16.1WY SenateHageman (R) >99%, +37WY Governor: Casner (D) vs Barlow (R); middle of the range Barlow+35.7; 90% of simulations between Barlow+54.3 and Barlow+17.2WY GovernorBarlow (R) >99%, +36WV Senate: Anderson (D) vs Capito (R); middle of the range Capito+29.9; 90% of simulations between Capito+50.3 and Capito+9.6WV SenateCapito (R) >99%, +30ID Governor: Pickens (D) vs Little (R); middle of the range Little+25.8; 90% of simulations between Little+40.7 and Little+10.7ID GovernorLittle (R) >99%, +26OK Senate: Thomas (D) vs Hern (R); middle of the range Hern+24.0; 90% of simulations between Hern+38.5 and Hern+9.3OK SenateHern (R) >99%, +24TN Senate: Bradshaw (D) vs Hagerty (R); middle of the range Hagerty+22.4; 90% of simulations between Hagerty+36.9 and Hagerty+7.7TN SenateHagerty (R) >99%, +22SD Governor: Ahlers (D) vs Rhoden (R); middle of the range Rhoden+20.3; 90% of simulations between Rhoden+35.2 and Rhoden+5.2SD GovernorRhoden (R) 99%, +20AR Governor: Love (D) vs Sanders (R); middle of the range Sanders+17.2; 90% of simulations between Sanders+32.2 and Sanders+2.1AR GovernorSanders (R) 97%, +17AL Senate: Wess (D) vs Moore (R); middle of the range Moore+17.1; 90% of simulations between Moore+27.3 and Moore+6.7AL SenateMoore (R) >99%, +17ID Senate: Achilles (I) vs Risch (R); middle of the range Risch+17.0; 90% of simulations between Risch+31.5 and Risch+3.0ID SenateRisch (R) 97%, +17TN Governor: Green (D) vs Blackburn (R); middle of the range Blackburn+15.7; 90% of simulations between Blackburn+26.4 and Blackburn+4.9TN GovernorBlackburn (R) 99%, +16AR Senate: Shoffner (D) vs Cotton (R); middle of the range Cotton+14.8; 90% of simulations between Cotton+29.8 and Shoffner+0.4AR SenateCotton (R) 95%, +15KY Senate: Booker (D) vs Barr (R); middle of the range Barr+13.3; 90% of simulations between Barr+27.8 and Booker+1.5KY SenateBarr (R) 93%, +13MT Senate: Bodnar (I) vs Alme (R); middle of the range Alme+12.9; 90% of simulations between Alme+22.9 and Alme+2.3MT SenateAlme (R) 97%, +13AL Governor: Jones (D) vs Tuberville (R); middle of the range Tuberville+12.5; 90% of simulations between Tuberville+22.7 and Tuberville+2.3AL GovernorTuberville (R) 97%, +12LA Senate: Davis (D) vs Letlow (R); middle of the range Letlow+10.3; 90% of simulations between Letlow+24.8 and Davis+4.4LA SenateLetlow (R) 88%, +10SC Governor: Johnson (D) vs Wilson (R); middle of the range Wilson+10.3; 90% of simulations between Wilson+19.7 and Wilson+0.8SC GovernorWilson (R) 96%, +10OK Governor: Munson (D) vs Mazzei (R); middle of the range Mazzei+8.9; 90% of simulations between Mazzei+23.8 and Munson+6.2OK GovernorMazzei (R) 84%, +8.9MS Senate: Colom (D) vs Hyde-Smith (R); middle of the range Hyde-Smith+8.9; 90% of simulations between Hyde-Smith+19.1 and Colom+1.3MS SenateHyde-Smith (R) 93%, +8.9SD Senate: Bengs (I) vs Rounds (R); middle of the range Rounds+8.4; 90% of simulations between Rounds+18.1 and Bengs+1.5SD SenateRounds (R) 92%, +8.4VT Governor: Janoo (D) vs Scott (R); middle of the range Scott+8.3; 90% of simulations between Scott+18.7 and Janoo+2.2VT GovernorScott (R) 91%, +8.3NH Governor: Warmington (D) vs Ayotte (R); middle of the range Ayotte+8.3; 90% of simulations between Ayotte+17.6 and Warmington+1.0NH GovernorAyotte (R) 93%, +8.3FL Senate: Nixon (D) vs Moody (R); middle of the range Moody+5.7; 90% of simulations between Moody+14.8 and Nixon+3.5FL SenateMoody (R) 86%, +5.7NE Governor: Walz (D) vs Pillen (R); middle of the range Pillen+5.5; 90% of simulations between Pillen+14.7 and Walz+3.9NE GovernorPillen (R) 85%, +5.5FL Governor: Jolly (D) vs Donalds (R); middle of the range Donalds+3.6; 90% of simulations between Donalds+12.6 and Jolly+5.5FL GovernorDonalds (R) 77%, +3.6TX Governor: Hinojosa (D) vs Abbott (R); middle of the range Abbott+3.1; 90% of simulations between Abbott+12.2 and Hinojosa+6.1TX GovernorAbbott (R) 73%, +3.1SC Senate: Andrews (D) vs Graham (R); middle of the range Graham+3.0; 90% of simulations between Graham+12.2 and Andrews+6.4SC SenateGraham (R) 72%, +3.0KS Governor: Holscher (D) vs Masterson (R); middle of the range Masterson+1.5; 90% of simulations between Masterson+10.7 and Holscher+7.9KS GovernorMasterson (R) 61%, +1.5NE Senate: Osborn (I) vs Ricketts (R); middle of the range Ricketts+0.8; 90% of simulations between Ricketts+9.9 and Osborn+8.3NE SenateRicketts (R) 57%, +0.8NV Governor: Ford (D) vs Lombardo (R); middle of the range Lombardo+0.5; 90% of simulations between Lombardo+9.8 and Ford+9.1NV GovernorLombardo (R) 54%, +0.5IA Senate: Turek (D) vs Hinson (R); middle of the range Hinson+0.3; 90% of simulations between Hinson+9.4 and Turek+8.8IA SenateHinson (R) 52%, +0.3KS Senate: Hamilton (D) vs Marshall (R); middle of the range Hamilton+0.4; 90% of simulations between Marshall+8.8 and Hamilton+9.7KS SenateHamilton (D) 53%, +0.4AK Senate: Peltola (D) vs Sullivan (R); middle of the range Peltola+1.4; 90% of simulations between Sullivan+11.6 and Peltola+14.4AK SenatePeltola (D) 57%, +1.4GA Governor: Bottoms (D) vs Jackson (R); middle of the range Bottoms+1.5; 90% of simulations between Jackson+7.9 and Bottoms+11.0GA GovernorBottoms (D) 62%, +1.5ME Senate: Jackson (D) vs Collins (R); middle of the range Jackson+1.9; 90% of simulations between Collins+7.1 and Jackson+11.2ME SenateJackson (D) 66%, +1.9TX Senate: Talarico (D) vs Paxton (R); middle of the range Talarico+2.2; 90% of simulations between Paxton+6.8 and Talarico+11.3TX SenateTalarico (D) 68%, +2.2OH Senate: Brown (D) vs Husted (R); middle of the range Brown+3.0; 90% of simulations between Husted+6.1 and Brown+12.2OH SenateBrown (D) 73%, +3.0OH Governor: Acton (D) vs Ramaswamy (R); middle of the range Acton+3.7; 90% of simulations between Ramaswamy+5.4 and Acton+13.0OH GovernorActon (D) 77%, +3.7WI Governor: Crowley (D) vs Tiffany (R); middle of the range Crowley+3.9; 90% of simulations between Tiffany+5.3 and Crowley+13.3WI GovernorCrowley (D) 78%, +3.9MI Senate: El-Sayed (D) vs Rogers (R); middle of the range El-Sayed+4.2; 90% of simulations between Rogers+5.0 and El-Sayed+13.5MI SenateEl-Sayed (D) 80%, +4.2OR Governor: Kotek (D) vs Drazan (R); middle of the range Kotek+5.4; 90% of simulations between Drazan+4.3 and Kotek+15.4OR GovernorKotek (D) 84%, +5.4IA Governor: Sand (D) vs Lahn (R); middle of the range Sand+5.6; 90% of simulations between Lahn+3.6 and Sand+14.7IA GovernorSand (D) 86%, +5.6MN Senate: Flanagan (D) vs Tafoya (R); middle of the range Flanagan+7.3; 90% of simulations between Tafoya+1.9 and Flanagan+16.5MN SenateFlanagan (D) 91%, +7.3NH Senate: Pappas (D) vs Sununu (R); middle of the range Pappas+7.8; 90% of simulations between Sununu+1.3 and Pappas+17.0NH SenatePappas (D) 93%, +7.8NM Governor: Haaland (D) vs Hull (R); middle of the range Haaland+8.1; 90% of simulations between Hull+1.9 and Haaland+18.3NM GovernorHaaland (D) 92%, +8.1MI Governor: Benson (D) vs James (R); middle of the range Benson+8.3; 90% of simulations between James+0.7 and Benson+17.6MI GovernorBenson (D) 94%, +8.3AK Governor: Kreiss-Tomkins (D) vs Wilson (R); middle of the range Kreiss-Tomkins+9.6; 90% of simulations between Wilson+3.4 and Kreiss-Tomkins+22.6AK GovernorKreiss-Tomkins (D) 89%, +9.6GA Senate: Ossoff (D) vs Collins (R); middle of the range Ossoff+10.1; 90% of simulations between Ossoff+0.8 and Ossoff+19.5GA SenateOssoff (D) 96%, +10NC Senate: Cooper (D) vs Whatley (R); middle of the range Cooper+10.5; 90% of simulations between Cooper+1.4 and Cooper+19.6NC SenateCooper (D) 97%, +10MN Governor: Klobuchar (D) vs Demuth (R); middle of the range Klobuchar+10.8; 90% of simulations between Klobuchar+1.5 and Klobuchar+20.2MN GovernorKlobuchar (D) 97%, +11AZ Governor: Hobbs (D) vs Biggs (R); middle of the range Hobbs+11.0; 90% of simulations between Hobbs+1.6 and Hobbs+20.7AZ GovernorHobbs (D) 97%, +11ME Governor: Pingree (D) vs Charles (R); middle of the range Pingree+11.6; 90% of simulations between Pingree+2.6 and Pingree+20.7ME GovernorPingree (D) 98%, +12NY Governor: Hochul (D) vs Blakeman (R); middle of the range Hochul+14.5; 90% of simulations between Hochul+5.1 and Hochul+24.1NY GovernorHochul (D) 99%, +15RI Governor: Foulkes (D) vs Block (I); middle of the range Foulkes+15.9; 90% of simulations between Foulkes+5.8 and Foulkes+25.8RI GovernorFoulkes (D) 99%, +16NM Senate: Luján (D) vs Marker (R); middle of the range Luján+16.7; 90% of simulations between Luján+2.2 and Luján+31.4NM SenateLuján (D) 97%, +17IL Senate: Stratton (D) vs Tracy (R); middle of the range Stratton+17.8; 90% of simulations between Stratton+3.2 and Stratton+32.5IL SenateStratton (D) 98%, +18CO Senate: Hickenlooper (D) vs Baisley (R); middle of the range Hickenlooper+18.0; 90% of simulations between Hickenlooper+3.5 and Hickenlooper+32.8CO SenateHickenlooper (D) 98%, +18VA Senate: Warner (D) vs Mizusawa (R); middle of the range Warner+18.5; 90% of simulations between Warner+1.3 and Warner+35.7VA SenateWarner (D) 96%, +18CT Governor: Lamont (D) vs Fazio (R); middle of the range Lamont+19.1; 90% of simulations between Lamont+9.5 and Lamont+28.9CT GovernorLamont (D) >99%, +19NJ Senate: Booker (D) vs Murphy (R); middle of the range Booker+19.9; 90% of simulations between Murphy+0.6 and Booker+40.5NJ SenateBooker (D) 94%, +20IL Governor: Pritzker (D) vs Bailey (R); middle of the range Pritzker+20.2; 90% of simulations between Pritzker+10.3 and Pritzker+30.1IL GovernorPritzker (D) >99%, +20PA Governor: Shapiro (D) vs Garrity (R); middle of the range Shapiro+21.2; 90% of simulations between Shapiro+11.7 and Shapiro+30.9PA GovernorShapiro (D) >99%, +21CA Governor: Becerra (D) vs Hilton (R); middle of the range Becerra+23.9; 90% of simulations between Becerra+14.7 and Becerra+33.3CA GovernorBecerra (D) >99%, +24CO Governor: Weiser (D) vs Marx (R); middle of the range Weiser+24.0; 90% of simulations between Weiser+3.4 and Weiser+44.6CO GovernorWeiser (D) 97%, +24MA Governor: Healey (D) vs Minogue (R); middle of the range Healey+24.3; 90% of simulations between Healey+14.8 and Healey+33.8MA GovernorHealey (D) >99%, +24RI Senate: Reed (D) vs McKay (R); middle of the range Reed+24.7; 90% of simulations between Reed+14.7 and Reed+35.0RI SenateReed (D) >99%, +25MA Senate: Markey (D) vs Deaton (R); middle of the range Markey+26.3; 90% of simulations between Markey+16.8 and Markey+36.0MA SenateMarkey (D) >99%, +26OR Senate: Merkley (D) vs Smith (R); middle of the range Merkley+26.6; 90% of simulations between Merkley+6.2 and Merkley+47.0OR SenateMerkley (D) 98%, +27DE Senate: Coons (D) vs Katz (R); middle of the range Coons+28.7; 90% of simulations between Coons+8.5 and Coons+49.0DE SenateCoons (D) >99%, +29MD Governor: Moore (D) vs Cox (R); middle of the range Moore+30.6; 90% of simulations between Moore+15.7 and Moore+45.7MD GovernorMoore (D) >99%, +31HI Governor: Green (D) vs Cordery (R); middle of the range Green+32.9; 90% of simulations between Green+11.8 and Green+53.9HI GovernorGreen (D) >99%, +33Favourite: chance of winning, middle margin

How to read it. Races are sorted from the most Republican middle result at the top to the most Democratic at the bottom. Bands beyond forty points are cut at the edge.

Source. FutureBallot election-day forecast: 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentiles of the simulated margin, newest published run per race. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Forecast · Senate and House

The Seat Ridges

How the forecast for the Senate has shifted, week by week

Each ridge is one week's forecast: every simulated count of Democratic seats, piled up. Blue is the part of the ridge at or above a majority, red the part below it. Newest at the bottom. Senate: Democrats win 51 or more seats, a majority, in 70% of simulations and fall short in 30% of simulations.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

Democrats at a majority or aboveDemocrats short of a majoritySenate: Democratic seats51 for a majorityOct 10Oct 18Oct 25Nov 170% at 51 or more30% below 5145505560

How to read it. A ridge sliding right means more simulations with more Democratic seats; a ridge getting narrower means the forecast has grown more certain.

Source. FutureBallot election-day chamber forecasts: the newest published run on each date, one a week back from the latest. In the Senate, if Democrats hold fifty seats, Republicans control the chamber through the vice president's vote. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Forecast · what changed

Why the Forecasts Moved

ID Governor moved most in the last thirty days: 1.8 points toward Pickens, the largest part from the ground-up estimate

The races whose published forecasts moved most over the last thirty days, each move split into what caused it: new polls, the calendar moving on, changes to the model, the ground-up estimate, news events and an unexplained remainder. The parts add up exactly to the move; the dot is where each race ended up.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

New pollsTime passingModel changesGround-up estimateNews eventsUnexplained1 pt1 pt2 pts2 ptsChange in the expected margin, in points← toward the candidate on the lefttoward the candidate on the right →ID Governor: net +1.8 points toward Pickens (D) in thirty daysID GovernorLittle (R) · Pickens (D)net 1.8 toward PickensME Senate: net +0.9 points toward Jackson (D) in thirty daysME SenateCollins (R) · Jackson (D)net 0.9 toward JacksonIL Senate: net -0.9 points toward Tracy (R) in thirty daysIL SenateTracy (R) · Stratton (D)net 0.9 toward TracyRI Governor: net -0.8 points toward Block (I) in thirty daysRI GovernorBlock (I) · Foulkes (D)net 0.8 toward BlockOH Senate: net -0.6 points toward Husted (R) in thirty daysOH SenateHusted (R) · Brown (D)net 0.6 toward HustedOK Senate: net +0.5 points toward Thomas (D) in thirty daysOK SenateHern (R) · Thomas (D)net 0.5 toward ThomasNE Senate: net -0.5 points toward Ricketts (R) in thirty daysNE SenateRicketts (R) · Osborn (I)net 0.5 toward RickettsNH Governor: net +0.3 points toward Warmington (D) in thirty daysNH GovernorAyotte (R) · Warmington (D)net 0.3 toward WarmingtonMD Governor: net +0.3 points toward Moore (D) in thirty daysMD GovernorCox (R) · Moore (D)net 0.3 toward MooreIA Governor: net +0.2 points toward Sand (D) in thirty daysIA GovernorLahn (R) · Sand (D)net 0.2 toward SandKS Senate: net -0.1 points toward Marshall (R) in thirty daysKS SenateMarshall (R) · Hamilton (D)net 0.1 toward Marshall

How to read it. Bars to the right moved the race toward the candidate named second; bars to the left toward the candidate named first. Long bars both ways mean causes that pulled against each other.

Source. FutureBallot forecast attribution (each published election-day move decomposed by re-running the model with one input changed at a time), margin in points. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Polls · who pays

Who Polls the Close Races

FutureBallot's archive holds no independent poll for ten of the thirty closest races

The closest Senate, governor and House races, and every poll of each that FutureBallot holds, split by who paid for it. Campaign and partisan polls are released when they help, so a race known only through them is harder to read.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026 and the latest poll fieldwork date, November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

Independent pollSponsored by a partisan groupA campaign's own pollWA-3: polls by who paid for them: independent 3, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0WA-3Perez (D) 52%IA-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0IA-2Mitchell (R) 52%MI-10: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0MI-10no independent pollBouchard (R) 52%IA Senate: polls by who paid for them: independent 33, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 2IA SenateHinson (R) 52%NY-17: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0NY-17Lawler (R) 53%KS Senate: polls by who paid for them: independent 12, sponsored by a partisan group 4, a campaign's own 1KS SenateHamilton (D) 53%TX-35: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0TX-35De La Cruz (R) 53%NV Governor: polls by who paid for them: independent 7, sponsored by a partisan group 7, a campaign's own 1NV GovernorLombardo (R) 54%CA-22: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0CA-22Valadao (R) 54%VA-1: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0VA-1Taylor (D) 55%MT-1: polls by who paid for them: independent 4, sponsored by a partisan group 5, a campaign's own 0MT-1Flint (R) 55%PA-8: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 0PA-8Cognetti (D) 55%WI-3: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 4, a campaign's own 0WI-3no independent pollCooke (D) 56%KY-6: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 6, a campaign's own 1KY-6no independent pollDembo (D) 56%MO-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 0MO-2Wagner (R) 56%FL-22: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0FL-22no independent pollDandiya (D) 57%NE Senate: polls by who paid for them: independent 10, sponsored by a partisan group 5, a campaign's own 3NE SenateRicketts (R) 57%FL-9: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0FL-9no independent pollGreen (R) 57%AK Senate: polls by who paid for them: independent 21, sponsored by a partisan group 7, a campaign's own 0AK SenatePeltola (D) 57%ME-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 5, a campaign's own 1ME-2LePage (R) 58%CO-5: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 2CO-5no independent pollCrank (R) 58%MI-4: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 4, a campaign's own 0MI-4no independent pollHuizenga (R) 59%MI-7: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0MI-7Lawrence (D) 60%NV-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 1NV-2no independent pollFlippo (R) 61%KS Governor: polls by who paid for them: independent 9, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 1KS GovernorMasterson (R) 61%GA Governor: polls by who paid for them: independent 16, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0GA GovernorBottoms (D) 62%VA-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0VA-2Luria (D) 62%OH-15: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 4, a campaign's own 0OH-15no independent pollCarey (R) 62%TX-15: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 0TX-15Pulido (D) 63%AZ-6: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 0AZ-6no independent pollMendoza (D) 64%Favourite, chancePolls of the race this cycle010203040

How to read it. Races are ordered with the closest at the top. Bar length is the number of polls.

Source. FutureBallot poll archive (the polls listed on the /polls pages), general-election questions this cycle; sponsor type as recorded from each release. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Money · Senate

Outside Money

Of the Senate races shown where the favourite's chance is below 90%, TX Senate has the most money behind it: $203 million so far

The chart shows what each campaign has raised and what outside groups have spent on its side, either for the candidate or against the opponent, in the eleven Senate races shown, those where the favourite's chance is below 90% and both candidates have campaign-finance records. Across all the races shown, campaign receipts and outside spending together come to $744 million.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026 and the latest campaign finance filing recorded, November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

Raised by the campaign (solid)Outside groups on that side (paler)DemocratRepublicanIndependent← money on the Republican's sidemoney on the Democrat's or independent's side →Millions of dollars: raised by each campaign, plus outside groups' spending on its sideTX Senate: Paxton (R) raised $22.3M, outside groups spent $2.7M on that side; Talarico (D) raised $146.3M, outside groups spent $31.3M on that sideTX SenatePaxton $25MTalarico $178MMI Senate: Rogers (R) raised $23.0M, outside groups spent $35.0M on that side; El-Sayed (D) raised $53.8M, outside groups spent $14.2M on that sideMI SenateRogers $58MEl-Sayed $68MOH Senate: Husted (R) raised $19.9M, outside groups spent $9.3M on that side; Brown (D) raised $68.4M, outside groups spent $1.5M on that sideOH SenateHusted $29MBrown $70MIA Senate: Hinson (R) raised $14.1M, outside groups spent $4.8M on that side; Turek (D) raised $24.3M, outside groups spent $20.4M on that sideIA SenateHinson $19MTurek $45MAK Senate: Sullivan (R) raised $11.5M, outside groups spent $4.6M on that side; Peltola (D) raised $36.9M, outside groups spent $3.0M on that sideAK SenateSullivan $16MPeltola $40MME Senate: Collins (R) raised $22.5M, outside groups spent $2.5M on that side; Jackson (D) raised $26.9M, outside groups spent $3.3M on that sideME SenateCollins $25MJackson $30MLA Senate: Letlow (R) raised $7.1M, outside groups spent $11.6M on that side; Davis (D) raised $5.0M, outside groups spent $10.9M on that sideLA SenateLetlow $19MDavis $16MSC Senate: Graham (R) raised $1.9M, outside groups spent $2.8M on that side; Andrews (D) raised $24.2M, outside groups spent $0.1M on that sideSC SenateGraham $5MAndrews $24MNE Senate: Ricketts (R) raised $14.5M, outside groups spent $0.9M on that side; Osborn (I) raised $11.0M, outside groups spent $0.1M on that sideNE SenateRicketts $15MOsborn $11MFL Senate: Moody (R) raised $14.5M, outside groups spent $0.6M on that side; Nixon (D) raised $11.3M, outside groups spent $0.1M on that sideFL SenateMoody $15MNixon $11MKS Senate: Marshall (R) raised $5.4M, outside groups spent $0.3M on that side; Hamilton (D) raised $19.2M, outside groups spent $0.0M on that sideKS SenateMarshall $6MHamilton $19M

How to read it. Solid: the campaign's own receipts. Paler: independent expenditures by outside groups on that candidate's side. Only races where both candidates' filings are linked are shown.

Source. Federal Election Commission filings as recorded by FutureBallot, newest record per candidate; millions of dollars. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Forecast · Senate

The Closest Senate Races, Week by Week

KS Senate rose furthest of the charted races on the list of closest Senate races (any place below fourteenth counted as fifteenth), from number eleven to number two

The twelve closest Senate races today, and where each ranked on the list of closest races in each of the last six weeks. Lines that cross are races trading places.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

DemocratRepublicanIndependentSep 28Oct 5Oct 12Oct 19Oct 26Nov 24. AK · Peltola (D) 57%AK 310. FL · Moody (R) 86%1. IA · Hinson (R) 52%IA 62. KS · Hamilton (D) 53%KS 1111. LA · Letlow (R) 88%5. ME · Jackson (D) 66%ME 49. MI · El-Sayed (D) 80%MI 112. MN · Flanagan (D) 91%MN 83. NE · Ricketts (R) 57%NE 78. OH · Brown (D) 73%OH 57. SC · Graham (R) 72%SC 106. TX · Talarico (D) 68%TX 2Rank, closest = 1

How to read it. Rank one is the race whose favourite's chance is nearest 50%. Lines start lower down or below the chart when a race was further from the top twelve.

Source. FutureBallot election-day Senate forecasts: the newest published run on or before each date. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Polls · the year

The Polling Calendar

61% of this year's 1,253 polls finished on or after Labor Day; one of the busiest days was October 1, when twenty-eight polls finished

Every day from January 1, 2026 to November 1 as a square, darker when more polls of a Senate, governor or House race finished their fieldwork that day. The election season shows up as a wave of colour from September on.

Data as of the latest poll fieldwork date, November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

No polls1–7 polls8–14 polls15–21 polls22–27 polls28 pollsJan 1: 0 pollsJanJan 2: 0 pollsJan 3: 0 pollsJan 4: 0 pollsJan 5: 0 pollsJan 6: 2 pollsJan 7: 1 pollJan 8: 1 pollJan 9: 0 pollsJan 10: 0 pollsJan 11: 2 pollsJan 12: 2 pollsJan 13: 0 pollsJan 14: 0 pollsJan 15: 1 pollJan 16: 0 pollsJan 17: 2 pollsJan 18: 0 pollsJan 19: 2 pollsJan 20: 0 pollsJan 21: 0 pollsJan 22: 0 pollsJan 23: 0 pollsJan 24: 0 pollsJan 25: 2 pollsJan 26: 0 pollsJan 27: 0 pollsJan 28: 1 pollJan 29: 1 pollJan 30: 1 pollJan 31: 2 pollsFeb 1: 0 pollsFebFeb 2: 2 pollsFeb 3: 2 pollsFeb 4: 3 pollsFeb 5: 1 pollFeb 6: 0 pollsFeb 7: 0 pollsFeb 8: 2 pollsFeb 9: 0 pollsFeb 10: 0 pollsFeb 11: 0 pollsFeb 12: 1 pollFeb 13: 0 pollsFeb 14: 0 pollsFeb 15: 0 pollsFeb 16: 5 pollsFeb 17: 2 pollsFeb 18: 1 pollFeb 19: 1 pollFeb 20: 0 pollsFeb 21: 0 pollsFeb 22: 3 pollsFeb 23: 1 pollFeb 24: 0 pollsFeb 25: 0 pollsFeb 26: 2 pollsFeb 27: 0 pollsFeb 28: 0 pollsMar 1: 1 pollMarMar 2: 3 pollsMar 3: 0 pollsMar 4: 0 pollsMar 5: 1 pollMar 6: 0 pollsMar 7: 0 pollsMar 8: 3 pollsMar 9: 0 pollsMar 10: 0 pollsMar 11: 1 pollMar 12: 2 pollsMar 13: 1 pollMar 14: 7 pollsMar 15: 0 pollsMar 16: 2 pollsMar 17: 2 pollsMar 18: 4 pollsMar 19: 1 pollMar 20: 0 pollsMar 21: 0 pollsMar 22: 1 pollMar 23: 2 pollsMar 24: 0 pollsMar 25: 0 pollsMar 26: 2 pollsMar 27: 0 pollsMar 28: 0 pollsMar 29: 1 pollMar 30: 0 pollsMar 31: 2 pollsApr 1: 1 pollAprApr 2: 0 pollsApr 3: 0 pollsApr 4: 0 pollsApr 5: 0 pollsApr 6: 1 pollApr 7: 1 pollApr 8: 0 pollsApr 9: 6 pollsApr 10: 0 pollsApr 11: 0 pollsApr 12: 1 pollApr 13: 2 pollsApr 14: 3 pollsApr 15: 0 pollsApr 16: 1 pollApr 17: 0 pollsApr 18: 0 pollsApr 19: 1 pollApr 20: 8 pollsApr 21: 2 pollsApr 22: 0 pollsApr 23: 1 pollApr 24: 2 pollsApr 25: 1 pollApr 26: 0 pollsApr 27: 1 pollApr 28: 2 pollsApr 29: 4 pollsApr 30: 1 pollMay 1: 1 pollMayMay 2: 1 pollMay 3: 0 pollsMay 4: 0 pollsMay 5: 2 pollsMay 6: 1 pollMay 7: 2 pollsMay 8: 1 pollMay 9: 1 pollMay 10: 0 pollsMay 11: 3 pollsMay 12: 1 pollMay 13: 0 pollsMay 14: 0 pollsMay 15: 0 pollsMay 16: 1 pollMay 17: 1 pollMay 18: 0 pollsMay 19: 0 pollsMay 20: 1 pollMay 21: 0 pollsMay 22: 0 pollsMay 23: 4 pollsMay 24: 1 pollMay 25: 0 pollsMay 26: 1 pollMay 27: 0 pollsMay 28: 3 pollsMay 29: 0 pollsMay 30: 1 pollMay 31: 3 pollsJun 1: 4 pollsJunJun 2: 1 pollJun 3: 0 pollsJun 4: 8 pollsJun 5: 0 pollsJun 6: 0 pollsJun 7: 1 pollJun 8: 0 pollsJun 9: 0 pollsJun 10: 2 pollsJun 11: 5 pollsJun 12: 4 pollsJun 13: 2 pollsJun 14: 2 pollsJun 15: 1 pollJun 16: 3 pollsJun 17: 0 pollsJun 18: 0 pollsJun 19: 2 pollsJun 20: 1 pollJun 21: 4 pollsJun 22: 1 pollJun 23: 11 pollsJun 24: 2 pollsJun 25: 7 pollsJun 26: 1 pollJun 27: 11 pollsJun 28: 5 pollsJun 29: 2 pollsJun 30: 4 pollsJul 1: 1 pollJulJul 2: 2 pollsJul 3: 0 pollsJul 4: 0 pollsJul 5: 0 pollsJul 6: 1 pollJul 7: 1 pollJul 8: 2 pollsJul 9: 1 pollJul 10: 1 pollJul 11: 3 pollsJul 12: 3 pollsJul 13: 4 pollsJul 14: 2 pollsJul 15: 2 pollsJul 16: 7 pollsJul 17: 5 pollsJul 18: 1 pollJul 19: 2 pollsJul 20: 5 pollsJul 21: 1 pollJul 22: 3 pollsJul 23: 2 pollsJul 24: 3 pollsJul 25: 0 pollsJul 26: 4 pollsJul 27: 5 pollsJul 28: 2 pollsJul 29: 3 pollsJul 30: 10 pollsJul 31: 5 pollsAug 1: 5 pollsAugAug 2: 1 pollAug 3: 2 pollsAug 4: 7 pollsAug 5: 2 pollsAug 6: 6 pollsAug 7: 2 pollsAug 8: 2 pollsAug 9: 5 pollsAug 10: 12 pollsAug 11: 2 pollsAug 12: 5 pollsAug 13: 10 pollsAug 14: 0 pollsAug 15: 2 pollsAug 16: 2 pollsAug 17: 8 pollsAug 18: 6 pollsAug 19: 0 pollsAug 20: 6 pollsAug 21: 3 pollsAug 22: 5 pollsAug 23: 6 pollsAug 24: 13 pollsAug 25: 1 pollAug 26: 4 pollsAug 27: 2 pollsAug 28: 9 pollsAug 29: 1 pollAug 30: 5 pollsAug 31: 8 pollsSep 1: 5 pollsSepSep 2: 5 pollsSep 3: 7 pollsSep 4: 3 pollsSep 5: 1 pollSep 6: 6 pollsSep 7: 3 pollsSep 8: 7 pollsSep 9: 8 pollsSep 10: 17 pollsSep 11: 9 pollsSep 12: 5 pollsSep 13: 7 pollsSep 14: 18 pollsSep 15: 8 pollsSep 16: 10 pollsSep 17: 12 pollsSep 18: 4 pollsSep 19: 6 pollsSep 20: 15 pollsSep 21: 24 pollsSep 22: 17 pollsSep 23: 11 pollsSep 24: 7 pollsSep 25: 6 pollsSep 26: 1 pollSep 27: 18 pollsSep 28: 13 pollsSep 29: 9 pollsSep 30: 26 pollsOct 1: 28 pollsOctOct 2: 2 pollsOct 3: 6 pollsOct 4: 22 pollsOct 5: 21 pollsOct 6: 10 pollsOct 7: 11 pollsOct 8: 16 pollsOct 9: 13 pollsOct 10: 7 pollsOct 11: 14 pollsOct 12: 16 pollsOct 13: 13 pollsOct 14: 28 pollsOct 15: 15 pollsOct 16: 9 pollsOct 17: 4 pollsOct 18: 20 pollsOct 19: 21 pollsOct 20: 27 pollsOct 21: 14 pollsOct 22: 23 pollsOct 23: 21 pollsOct 24: 7 pollsOct 25: 19 pollsOct 26: 18 pollsOct 27: 14 pollsOct 28: 20 pollsOct 29: 24 pollsOct 30: 8 pollsOct 31: 13 pollsNov 1: 24 pollsNovLabor Day28 polls on Oct 1MonWedFri

How to read it. Columns are weeks; rows are days of the week. Shade is the number of polls ending that day, from none to the number on the busiest day of the year.

Source. FutureBallot poll archive (the polls listed on /polls), general-election questions, by the last day of fieldwork; a poll of several races counts once. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Polls · the year

The Poll Stream

Polling swelled from a trickle to 132 polls in its busiest week; 76% of this year's polls from January 5 on were independent

Every week from January 5, 2026 to the week of October 26, the number of Senate, governor and House polls that finished fieldwork, split by who paid for them, as a stream that widens with the volume.

Data as of the latest poll fieldwork date, November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

IndependentSponsored by a partisan groupA campaign's own poll50 polls a weekJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct132 polls, week of Oct 19

How to read it. The stream's thickness each week is the number of polls; the layers show who paid.

Source. FutureBallot poll archive (the polls listed on /polls), general-election questions, by the last day of fieldwork; a poll of several races counts once. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Forecast · Senate

Senate Horizon Strips

Three Senate races changed favourite since September 24: IA, KS, NE

Every Senate race with at least five days of forecasts, one thin strip each, showing the forecast's chance day by day. The fill rises with the favourite's chance above 50%, in that favourite's colour; the darker layer starts at 75%. A strip that changes colour is a race that changed favourite.

Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

DemocratRepublicanIndependentIA SenateHinson (R) 52%KS SenateHamilton (D) 53%NE SenateRicketts (R) 57%AK SenatePeltola (D) 57%ME SenateJackson (D) 66%TX SenateTalarico (D) 68%SC SenateGraham (R) 72%OH SenateBrown (D) 73%MI SenateEl-Sayed (D) 80%FL SenateMoody (R) 86%LA SenateLetlow (R) 88%MN SenateFlanagan (D) 91%SD SenateRounds (R) 92%NH SenatePappas (D) 93%MS SenateHyde-Smith (R) 93%KY SenateBarr (R) 93%NJ SenateBooker (D) 94%AR SenateCotton (R) 95%GA SenateOssoff (D) 96%VA SenateWarner (D) 96%NC SenateCooper (D) 97%NM SenateLuján (D) 97%MT SenateAlme (R) 97%ID SenateRisch (R) 97%IL SenateStratton (D) 98%CO SenateHickenlooper (D) 98%OR SenateMerkley (D) 98%DE SenateCoons (D) >99%AL SenateMoore (R) >99%TN SenateHagerty (R) >99%WV SenateCapito (R) >99%OK SenateHern (R) >99%WY SenateHageman (R) >99%RI SenateReed (D) >99%MA SenateMarkey (D) >99%Sep 24Oct 1Oct 8Oct 15Oct 22Oct 29Favourite today

How to read it. Pale fill: favourite between 50% and 75%. Dark fill: 75% or more, rising to the top of the strip at 100%. Closest races at the top.

Source. FutureBallot election-day Senate forecasts: the newest published run on each date. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.

Money · Senate

The Senate Money Map

Of the Senate races with both candidates' filings linked, the three with the most money hold 36% of the $1,269 million: TX, GA, MI

Every Senate race with both candidates' filings linked, as a block sized by all the money on both sides: what the campaigns raised and what outside groups spent for each. Each block is split by side, in each candidate's party colour.

Data as of the latest campaign finance filing recorded, November 1, 2026.

Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.

DemocratRepublicanIndependentTX Senate: $203M; Paxton (R) $25M, Talarico (D) $178M; favourite Talarico (D) 68%TX$203MGA Senate: $129M; Collins (R) $12M, Ossoff (D) $117M; favourite Ossoff (D) 96%GA$129MMI Senate: $126M; Rogers (R) $58M, El-Sayed (D) $68M; favourite El-Sayed (D) 80%MI$126MOH Senate: $99M; Husted (R) $29M, Brown (D) $70M; favourite Brown (D) 73%OH$99MNC Senate: $80M; Whatley (R) $21M, Cooper (D) $59M; favourite Cooper (D) 97%NC$80MIA Senate: $64M; Hinson (R) $19M, Turek (D) $45M; favourite Hinson (R) 52%IA$64MAK Senate: $56M; Sullivan (R) $16M, Peltola (D) $40M; favourite Peltola (D) 57%AK$56MME Senate: $55M; Collins (R) $25M, Jackson (D) $30M; favourite Jackson (D) 66%ME$55MLA Senate: $35M; Letlow (R) $19M, Davis (D) $16M; favourite Letlow (R) 88%LA$35MNH Senate: $34M; Sununu (R) $10M, Pappas (D) $24M; favourite Pappas (D) 93%NH$34MMN Senate: $32M; Tafoya (R) $20M, Flanagan (D) $12M; favourite Flanagan (D) 91%MN$32MIL Senate: $32M; Tracy (R) $15M, Stratton (D) $16M; favourite Stratton (D) 98%IL$32MKY Senate: $30M; Barr (R) $20M, Booker (D) $10M; favourite Barr (R) 93%KY$30MSC Senate: $29M; Graham (R) $5M, Andrews (D) $24M; favourite Graham (R) 72%SC$29MNE Senate: $27M; Ricketts (R) $15M, Osborn (I) $11M; favourite Ricketts (R) 57%NE$27MFL Senate: $27M; Moody (R) $15M, Nixon (D) $11M; favourite Moody (R) 86%FL$27MKS Senate: $25M; Marshall (R) $6M, Hamilton (D) $19M; favourite Hamilton (D) 53%KS$25MVA Senate: $22M; Mizusawa (R) $1M, Warner (D) $20M; favourite Warner (D) 96%VA$22MNJ Senate: $21M; Murphy (R) $0M, Booker (D) $21M; favourite Booker (D) 94%NJ$21MAL Senate: $21M; Moore (R) $21M, Wess (D) $0M; favourite Moore (R) >99%AL$21MAR Senate: $14M; Cotton (R) $10M, Shoffner (D) $4M; favourite Cotton (R) 95%AR$14MOK Senate: $13M; Hern (R) $13M, Thomas (D) $0M; favourite Hern (R) >99%OK$13MMT Senate: $12M; Alme (R) $6M, Bodnar (I) $5M; favourite Alme (R) 97%MT$12MMS Senate: $11M; Hyde-Smith (R) $5M, Colom (D) $7M; favourite Hyde-Smith (R) 93%MSMA Senate: $11M; Deaton (R) $5M, Markey (D) $6M; favourite Markey (D) >99%MACO Senate: $10M; Baisley (R) $0M, Hickenlooper (D) $10M; favourite Hickenlooper (D) 98%COTN Senate: $9M; Hagerty (R) $9M, Bradshaw (D) $0M; favourite Hagerty (R) >99%TNNM Senate: $7M; Marker (R) $0M, Luján (D) $6M; favourite Luján (D) 97%NMSD Senate: $6M; Rounds (R) $4M, Bengs (I) $2M; favourite Rounds (R) 92%SDWV Senate: $6M; Capito (R) $6M, Anderson (D) $0M; favourite Capito (R) >99%WVID Senate: $6M; Risch (R) $4M, Achilles (I) $2M; favourite Risch (R) 97%IDOR Senate: $6M; Smith (R) $0M, Merkley (D) $5M; favourite Merkley (D) 98%ORDE Senate: $5M; Katz (R) $0M, Coons (D) $5M; favourite Coons (D) >99%DERI Senate: $4M; McKay (R) $0M, Reed (D) $4M; favourite Reed (D) >99%RIWY Senate: $4M; Hageman (R) $4M, Byrd (D) $0M; favourite Hageman (R) >99%WY

How to read it. Bigger block, more money. The split inside each block shows which side the money was on; the split is not the forecast.

Source. Federal Election Commission filings as recorded by FutureBallot, newest record per candidate; millions of dollars. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.

Link to this chartChart image pageDownload the data (CSV)Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.