Explore 2026 in charts This election's forecasts, polls and money, drawn from the newest published forecast and the poll and money records behind it. Each chart says what date its data is as of. Link to it, embed its image, or take its numbers.
Also: The chart library: elections past
A Hundred Novembers Every Forecast House Race in One Picture Where the Toss-Ups Went The Fog of the Forecast The Seat Ridges Why the Forecasts Moved Who Polls the Close Races Outside Money The Closest Senate Races, Week by Week The Polling Calendar The Poll Stream Senate Horizon Strips The Senate Money Map Forecast · Senate and governors
In twelve of the twenty-four closest Senate and governor races, the trailing candidate wins at least one November in four
Each square of a hundred dots is one race's forecast chance, counted out: a 70% chance is seventy dots in the favourite's colour and thirty in the other candidate's. Those thirty are Novembers the forecast thinks can really happen, not errors.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Democrat Republican Independent IA Senate: Hinson (R) wins 52 in 100, Turek (D) 48 in 100 IA Senate Hinson (R) 52 in 100 Turek (D) 48 in 100 middle margin +0.3 KS Senate: Hamilton (D) wins 53 in 100, Marshall (R) 47 in 100 KS Senate Hamilton (D) 53 in 100 Marshall (R) 47 in 100 middle margin +0.4 NV Governor: Lombardo (R) wins 54 in 100, Ford (D) 46 in 100 NV Governor Lombardo (R) 54 in 100 Ford (D) 46 in 100 middle margin +0.5 NE Senate: Ricketts (R) wins 57 in 100, Osborn (I) 43 in 100 NE Senate Ricketts (R) 57 in 100 Osborn (I) 43 in 100 middle margin +0.8 AK Senate: Peltola (D) wins 57 in 100, Sullivan (R) 43 in 100 AK Senate Peltola (D) 57 in 100 Sullivan (R) 43 in 100 middle margin +1.4 KS Governor: Masterson (R) wins 61 in 100, Holscher (D) 39 in 100 KS Governor Masterson (R) 61 in 100 Holscher (D) 39 in 100 middle margin +1.5 GA Governor: Bottoms (D) wins 62 in 100, Jackson (R) 38 in 100 GA Governor Bottoms (D) 62 in 100 Jackson (R) 38 in 100 middle margin +1.5 ME Senate: Jackson (D) wins 66 in 100, Collins (R) 34 in 100 ME Senate Jackson (D) 66 in 100 Collins (R) 34 in 100 middle margin +1.9 TX Senate: Talarico (D) wins 68 in 100, Paxton (R) 32 in 100 TX Senate Talarico (D) 68 in 100 Paxton (R) 32 in 100 middle margin +2.2 SC Senate: Graham (R) wins 72 in 100, Andrews (D) 28 in 100 SC Senate Graham (R) 72 in 100 Andrews (D) 28 in 100 middle margin +3.0 OH Senate: Brown (D) wins 73 in 100, Husted (R) 27 in 100 OH Senate Brown (D) 73 in 100 Husted (R) 27 in 100 middle margin +3.0 TX Governor: Abbott (R) wins 73 in 100, Hinojosa (D) 27 in 100 TX Governor Abbott (R) 73 in 100 Hinojosa (D) 27 in 100 middle margin +3.1 OH Governor: Acton (D) wins 77 in 100, Ramaswamy (R) 23 in 100 OH Governor Acton (D) 77 in 100 Ramaswamy (R) 23 in 100 middle margin +3.7 FL Governor: Donalds (R) wins 77 in 100, Jolly (D) 23 in 100 FL Governor Donalds (R) 77 in 100 Jolly (D) 23 in 100 middle margin +3.6 WI Governor: Crowley (D) wins 78 in 100, Tiffany (R) 22 in 100 WI Governor Crowley (D) 78 in 100 Tiffany (R) 22 in 100 middle margin +3.9 MI Senate: El-Sayed (D) wins 80 in 100, Rogers (R) 20 in 100 MI Senate El-Sayed (D) 80 in 100 Rogers (R) 20 in 100 middle margin +4.2 OR Governor: Kotek (D) wins 84 in 100, Drazan (R) 16 in 100 OR Governor Kotek (D) 84 in 100 Drazan (R) 16 in 100 middle margin +5.4 OK Governor: Mazzei (R) wins 84 in 100, Munson (D) 16 in 100 OK Governor Mazzei (R) 84 in 100 Munson (D) 16 in 100 middle margin +8.9 NE Governor: Pillen (R) wins 85 in 100, Walz (D) 15 in 100 NE Governor Pillen (R) 85 in 100 Walz (D) 15 in 100 middle margin +5.5 IA Governor: Sand (D) wins 86 in 100, Lahn (R) 14 in 100 IA Governor Sand (D) 86 in 100 Lahn (R) 14 in 100 middle margin +5.6 FL Senate: Moody (R) wins 86 in 100, Nixon (D) 14 in 100 FL Senate Moody (R) 86 in 100 Nixon (D) 14 in 100 middle margin +5.7 LA Senate: Letlow (R) wins 88 in 100, Davis (D) 12 in 100 LA Senate Letlow (R) 88 in 100 Davis (D) 12 in 100 middle margin +10.3 AK Governor: Kreiss-Tomkins (D) wins 89 in 100, Wilson (R) 11 in 100 AK Governor Kreiss-Tomkins (D) 89 in 100 Wilson (R) 11 in 100 middle margin +9.6 VT Governor: Scott (R) wins 91 in 100, Janoo (D) 9 in 100 VT Governor Scott (R) 91 in 100 Janoo (D) 9 in 100 middle margin +8.3
How to read it. Read across: the more dots in the trailing candidate's colour, the closer the race. Races are ordered by the favourite's chance, lowest first.
Source. FutureBallot election-day forecast, newest published run per race. Races where the favourite's chance is 97% or more are left out. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Forecast · House
The House in 412 forecast districts: a 60% chance or better for Democrats in 207, for Republicans in 187; eighteen toss-ups below that
Every House district with a published forecast between two named candidates (412 of 435; the rest are not drawn), as one dot placed at its middle margin, except those beyond fifty points either way, which are counted at the edges. Dots pile up where districts crowd together; the darker a dot, the surer the forecast. The shaded strip holds the districts within five points.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Democrat Republican Solid dot: likely or safe Faint dot: toss-up or lean WA-3: Perez (D) 52%, middle margin 0.2 IA-2: Mitchell (R) 52%, middle margin 0.4 MI-10: Bouchard (R) 52%, middle margin 0.4 NY-17: Lawler (R) 53%, middle margin 0.4 TX-35: De La Cruz (R) 53%, middle margin 0.5 CA-22: Valadao (R) 54%, middle margin 0.6 VA-1: Taylor (D) 55%, middle margin 0.6 PA-8: Cognetti (D) 55%, middle margin 0.7 MT-1: Flint (R) 55%, middle margin 0.8 MO-2: Wagner (R) 56%, middle margin 0.9 WI-3: Cooke (D) 56%, middle margin 0.9 KY-6: Dembo (D) 56%, middle margin 0.9 FL-22: Dandiya (D) 57%, middle margin 0.9 FL-9: Green (R) 57%, middle margin 1.0 CO-5: Crank (R) 58%, middle margin 1.2 MI-4: Huizenga (R) 59%, middle margin 1.2 ME-2: LePage (R) 58%, middle margin 1.3 MI-7: Lawrence (D) 60%, middle margin 1.4 VA-2: Luria (D) 62%, middle margin 1.6 NV-2: Flippo (R) 61%, middle margin 1.7 OH-15: Carey (R) 62%, middle margin 1.8 TX-15: Pulido (D) 63%, middle margin 1.9 AZ-6: Mendoza (D) 64%, middle margin 2.0 AL-2: Marques (R) 64%, middle margin 2.0 CO-8: Rutinel (D) 65%, middle margin 2.2 PA-10: Stelson (D) 67%, middle margin 2.4 SC-1: Honeycutt (R) 66%, middle margin 2.6 NJ-7: Bennett (D) 68%, middle margin 2.6 AZ-1: Shah (D) 69%, middle margin 3.0 PA-7: Brooks (D) 71%, middle margin 3.1 FL-7: Dalton (D) 71%, middle margin 3.2 PA-1: Fitzpatrick (R) 72%, middle margin 3.3 IA-1: Bohannan (D) 74%, middle margin 3.5 FL-13: Luna (R) 73%, middle margin 3.6 MN-1: Finstad (R) 74%, middle margin 3.6 TX-34: Gonzalez (D) 74%, middle margin 3.7 IA-3: Garriott (D) 76%, middle margin 3.8 AK-AL: Begich (R) 70%, middle margin 3.9 CO-3: Hurd (R) 77%, middle margin 4.0 AR-2: Hill (R) 77%, middle margin 4.1 AZ-2: Crane (R) 78%, middle margin 4.2 NY-21: Constantino (R) 75%, middle margin 4.2 TX-28: Cuellar (D) 76%, middle margin 4.3 TX-23: Herrera (R) 78%, middle margin 4.5 WI-1: Steil (R) 79%, middle margin 4.5 IN-5: Spartz (R) 80%, middle margin 4.5 FL-16: Gruters (R) 79%, middle margin 4.6 NC-3: Murphy (R) 80%, middle margin 4.9 FL-25: Moskowitz (D) 80%, middle margin 5.0 NM-2: Vasquez (D) 82%, middle margin 5.0 VA-5: McGuire (R) 83%, middle margin 5.3 OH-9: Kaptur (D) 84%, middle margin 5.7 NE-1: Flood (R) 85%, middle margin 5.9 CA-48: von Wilpert (D) 85%, middle margin 6.0 FL-14: Castor (D) 85%, middle margin 6.0 OH-7: Poindexter (D) 85%, middle margin 6.1 NC-1: Davis (D) 85%, middle margin 6.1 NY-1: LaLota (R) 87%, middle margin 6.2 FL-27: Salazar (R) 86%, middle margin 6.3 NH-1: Shaheen (D) 84%, middle margin 6.4 NC-11: Ager (D) 88%, middle margin 6.7 NC-9: Hudson (R) 88%, middle margin 7.0 TN-5: Hatcher (R) 90%, middle margin 7.7 OH-1: Landsman (D) 90%, middle margin 7.7 OH-10: Turner (R) 92%, middle margin 8.5 NC-5: Foxx (R) 92%, middle margin 8.6 NE-2: Powell (D) 91%, middle margin 8.7 NC-13: Knott (R) 93%, middle margin 8.7 FL-11: Strada (R) 93%, middle margin 8.8 CA-6: Pan (D) 88%, middle margin 8.9 TN-9: Taylor (R) 93%, middle margin 9.0 WA-5: Baumgartner (R) 94%, middle margin 9.0 CO-4: Boebert (R) 94%, middle margin 9.1 GA-7: McCormick (R) 94%, middle margin 9.3 MN-2: Little (D) 92%, middle margin 9.3 FL-2: Rogers (R) 94%, middle margin 9.4 NC-14: Moore (R) 94%, middle margin 9.4 NC-7: Rouzer (R) 94%, middle margin 9.5 GA-1: Kingston (R) 93%, middle margin 9.6 SC-2: Wilson (R) 95%, middle margin 9.7 TX-32: Yarbrough (R) 94%, middle margin 9.8 OH-8: Davidson (R) 95%, middle margin 9.8 AZ-8: Hamadeh (R) 96%, middle margin 9.9 TX-9: Mealer (R) 95%, middle margin 10.0 NJ-2: Van Drew (R) 96%, middle margin 10.5 MN-8: Stauber (R) 96%, middle margin 10.6 FL-4: Bean (R) 96%, middle margin 10.6 NC-6: McDowell (R) 96%, middle margin 10.7 NY-3: Suozzi (D) 96%, middle margin 10.8 OK-5: Bice (R) 97%, middle margin 10.9 TX-24: Van Duyne (R) 96%, middle margin 11.1 WI-6: Grothman (R) 97%, middle margin 11.2 WI-8: Wied (R) 97%, middle margin 11.3 MD-1: Harris (R) 97%, middle margin 11.4 AZ-5: Lamb (R) 96%, middle margin 11.7 KS-2: Schmidt (R) 97%, middle margin 11.9 NC-10: Harrigan (R) 97%, middle margin 12.0 GA-12: Allen (R) 98%, middle margin 12.1 FL-8: Haridopolos (R) 97%, middle margin 12.2 NV-3: Lee (D) 98%, middle margin 12.6 NC-8: Harris (R) 98%, middle margin 12.9 FL-12: Bilirakis (R) 98%, middle margin 12.9 NY-4: Gillen (D) 98%, middle margin 13.1 GA-10: Gaines (R) 97%, middle margin 13.1 NV-1: Titus (D) 98%, middle margin 13.1 CA-13: Gray (D) 98%, middle margin 13.4 TX-38: Bonck (R) 98%, middle margin 13.4 TX-31: Carter (R) 98%, middle margin 13.4 FL-18: Franklin (R) 98%, middle margin 13.4 TX-10: Gober (R) 98%, middle margin 13.8 FL-3: Cammack (R) 99%, middle margin 13.8 FL-5: Rutherford (R) 98%, middle margin 14.0 NY-2: Garbarino (R) 99%, middle margin 14.1 CA-5: McClintock (R) 98%, middle margin 14.2 CA-45: Tran (D) 98%, middle margin 14.2 TX-17: Sessions (R) 98%, middle margin 14.4 WI-7: Alfonso (R) 98%, middle margin 14.4 TX-21: Teixeira (R) 99%, middle margin 14.4 FL-15: Lee (R) 99%, middle margin 14.5 MN-6: Emmer (R) 99%, middle margin 14.6 WA-4: McKinney (R) 98%, middle margin 14.6 CT-5: Hayes (D) 99%, middle margin 14.6 OK-1: Tedford (R) 98%, middle margin 14.7 TX-5: Gooden (R) 98%, middle margin 14.7 SC-7: Fry (R) >99%, middle margin 14.8 NV-4: Horsford (D) 99%, middle margin 14.8 MI-1: Bergman (R) 99%, middle margin 14.9 TX-22: Nehls (R) 99%, middle margin 14.9 OH-14: Joyce (R) 99%, middle margin 15.0 FL-21: Mast (R) 99%, middle margin 15.1 NY-18: Ryan (D) >99%, middle margin 15.1 TX-2: Toth (R) 99%, middle margin 15.2 UT-2: Moore (R) 99%, middle margin 15.4 TX-27: Cloud (R) 99%, middle margin 15.5 SC-4: Timmons (R) >99%, middle margin 15.5 PA-11: Smucker (R) >99%, middle margin 15.6 NM-3: Leger Fernández (D) >99%, middle margin 16.0 CA-23: Obernolte (R) >99%, middle margin 16.2 IN-1: Mrvan (D) >99%, middle margin 16.3 TN-6: Garrett (R) 99%, middle margin 16.5 TN-4: DesJarlais (R) >99%, middle margin 16.5 TN-7: Van Epps (R) >99%, middle margin 16.6 WI-5: Fitzgerald (R) >99%, middle margin 16.6 NY-19: Riley (D) >99%, middle margin 16.7 TX-6: Ellzey (R) >99%, middle margin 16.8 RI-2: Magaziner (D) >99%, middle margin 16.9 CA-1: McGuire (D) >99%, middle margin 17.0 FL-17: Steube (R) >99%, middle margin 17.2 TX-14: Weber (R) >99%, middle margin 17.3 FL-26: Díaz-Balart (R) >99%, middle margin 17.4 TX-25: Williams (R) >99%, middle margin 17.4 TN-8: Kustoff (R) >99%, middle margin 17.5 TX-4: Fallon (R) >99%, middle margin 17.5 NJ-9: Pou (D) >99%, middle margin 17.6 MI-8: Rivet (D) >99%, middle margin 17.6 TX-3: Self (R) >99%, middle margin 17.6 SC-5: Climer (R) 99%, middle margin 17.6 TX-36: Babin (R) >99%, middle margin 17.7 TX-8: Steinmann (R) >99%, middle margin 17.8 CA-21: Costa (D) >99%, middle margin 17.8 TX-12: Goldman (R) >99%, middle margin 18.0 OH-5: Latta (R) >99%, middle margin 18.1 VA-7: Vindman (D) >99%, middle margin 18.1 TX-26: Gill (R) >99%, middle margin 18.3 IL-16: LaHood (R) >99%, middle margin 18.3 UT-4: Kennedy (R) >99%, middle margin 18.3 OR-2: Bentz (R) >99%, middle margin 18.5 KS-4: Estes (R) >99%, middle margin 18.5 GA-11: Cowan (R) >99%, middle margin 18.5 NY-11: Malliotakis (R) >99%, middle margin 18.8 NH-2: Goodlander (D) >99%, middle margin 18.8 OH-13: Sykes (D) >99%, middle margin 19.0 IA-4: McGowan (R) >99%, middle margin 19.1 PA-16: Kelly (R) >99%, middle margin 19.1 MO-3: Onder (R) >99%, middle margin 19.1 VA-10: Subramanyam (D) >99%, middle margin 19.4 AR-3: Womack (R) >99%, middle margin 19.4 IN-2: Yakym (R) >99%, middle margin 19.5 NY-23: Langworthy (R) >99%, middle margin 19.8 CA-25: Ruiz (D) >99%, middle margin 19.9 MT-2: Downing (R) >99%, middle margin 19.9 CA-41: Sánchez (D) >99%, middle margin 20.0 OR-5: Bynum (D) >99%, middle margin 20.2 CA-35: Torres (D) >99%, middle margin 20.2 NY-24: Tenney (R) >99%, middle margin 20.3 IL-14: Underwood (D) >99%, middle margin 20.4 NM-1: Stansbury (D) >99%, middle margin 20.5 IL-11: Foster (D) >99%, middle margin 20.6 MD-6: Delaney (D) >99%, middle margin 20.8 WA-8: Schrier (D) >99%, middle margin 20.9 CA-39: Takano (D) >99%, middle margin 21.0 OR-6: Salinas (D) >99%, middle margin 21.1 MI-5: Walberg (R) >99%, middle margin 21.2 OR-4: Hoyle (D) >99%, middle margin 21.4 NJ-5: Gottheimer (D) >99%, middle margin 21.5 AZ-4: Stanton (D) >99%, middle margin 21.5 AL-5: Strong (R) >99%, middle margin 21.5 SD-AL: Jackley (R) >99%, middle margin 21.5 GA-2: Bishop (D) >99%, middle margin 21.6 IN-6: Shreve (R) >99%, middle margin 21.6 NJ-3: Conaway (D) >99%, middle margin 21.7 CA-31: Cisneros (D) >99%, middle margin 21.7 ID-2: Simpson (R) >99%, middle margin 21.8 IL-6: Casten (D) >99%, middle margin 21.8 IL-17: Sorensen (D) >99%, middle margin 21.9 IL-8: Bean (D) >99%, middle margin 22.0 MI-3: Scholten (D) >99%, middle margin 22.1 CA-9: Harder (D) >99%, middle margin 22.3 FL-28: Giménez (R) >99%, middle margin 22.5 OH-12: Balderson (R) >99%, middle margin 22.5 IN-3: Stutzman (R) >99%, middle margin 22.7 PA-17: Deluzio (D) >99%, middle margin 22.7 IN-4: Baird (R) >99%, middle margin 22.7 CA-33: Aguilar (D) >99%, middle margin 22.8 KS-3: Davids (D) >99%, middle margin 23.1 GA-3: Jack (R) >99%, middle margin 23.3 CA-38: Solis (D) >99%, middle margin 23.4 NJ-6: Pallone (D) >99%, middle margin 23.4 AZ-9: Gosar (R) >99%, middle margin 23.5 IN-9: Houchin (R) >99%, middle margin 23.5 OH-6: Rulli (R) >99%, middle margin 23.5 CA-27: Whitesides (D) >99%, middle margin 23.6 VA-6: Cline (R) >99%, middle margin 23.6 PA-14: Reschenthaler (R) >99%, middle margin 23.6 CA-42: Garcia (D) >99%, middle margin 23.8 PA-6: Houlahan (D) >99%, middle margin 23.8 NY-22: Mannion (D) >99%, middle margin 23.9 CA-20: Fong (R) >99%, middle margin 24.1 NY-6: Meng (D) >99%, middle margin 24.1 AL-6: Palmer (R) >99%, middle margin 24.3 CA-49: Levin (D) >99%, middle margin 24.3 CA-47: Min (D) >99%, middle margin 24.6 FL-19: Schwartzel (R) >99%, middle margin 24.7 MI-2: Moolenaar (R) >99%, middle margin 24.8 CA-3: Bera (D) >99%, middle margin 24.8 GA-14: Fuller (R) >99%, middle margin 24.9 TX-11: Pfluger (R) >99%, middle margin 24.9 FL-23: Frankel (D) >99%, middle margin 25.0 FL-6: Fine (R) >99%, middle margin 25.3 NJ-11: Mejia (D) >99%, middle margin 25.4 GA-9: Clyde (R) >99%, middle margin 25.4 NJ-4: Smith (R) >99%, middle margin 25.5 TN-2: Burchett (R) >99%, middle margin 25.6 KS-1: Mann (R) >99%, middle margin 25.6 KY-4: Gallrein (R) >99%, middle margin 25.6 GA-8: Scott (R) >99%, middle margin 26.0 MS-3: Guest (R) >99%, middle margin 26.0 TX-16: Escobar (D) >99%, middle margin 26.1 CA-26: Irwin (D) >99%, middle margin 26.2 MA-9: Keating (D) >99%, middle margin 26.2 CT-3: DeLauro (D) >99%, middle margin 26.5 RI-1: Amo (D) >99%, middle margin 26.6 OK-4: Cole (R) >99%, middle margin 26.6 IL-4: Garcia (D) >99%, middle margin 26.6 AL-1: Carl (R) >99%, middle margin 26.7 TN-3: Fleischmann (R) >99%, middle margin 26.8 CA-46: Correa (D) >99%, middle margin 26.9 UT-3: Maloy (R) >99%, middle margin 26.9 CT-2: Courtney (D) >99%, middle margin 27.0 DE-AL: McBride (D) >99%, middle margin 27.1 ME-1: Pingree (D) >99%, middle margin 27.5 IL-13: Budzinski (D) >99%, middle margin 27.8 CO-7: Pettersen (D) >99%, middle margin 27.8 MI-9: McClain (R) >99%, middle margin 27.8 FL-1: Patronis (R) >99%, middle margin 28.1 NY-20: Tonko (D) >99%, middle margin 28.1 IN-8: Messmer (R) >99%, middle margin 28.5 NJ-1: Norcross (D) >99%, middle margin 28.9 CA-50: Peters (D) >99%, middle margin 29.4 CA-51: Jacobs (D) >99%, middle margin 29.4 PA-12: Lee (D) >99%, middle margin 29.4 CA-52: Vargas (D) >99%, middle margin 29.4 PA-4: Dean (D) >99%, middle margin 29.8 MI-11: Moss (D) >99%, middle margin 30.0 NJ-12: Hamawy (D) >99%, middle margin 30.1 CO-6: Crow (D) >99%, middle margin 30.1 WA-10: Strickland (D) >99%, middle margin 30.2 IL-15: Miller (R) >99%, middle margin 30.2 MN-7: Fischbach (R) >99%, middle margin 30.6 PA-9: Meuser (R) >99%, middle margin 30.7 OH-2: Taylor (R) >99%, middle margin 31.0 MD-2: Olszewski (D) >99%, middle margin 31.0 ND-AL: Fedorchak (R) >99%, middle margin 31.1 WA-6: Randall (D) >99%, middle margin 31.1 VT-AL: Balint (D) >99%, middle margin 31.2 OH-4: Jordan (R) >99%, middle margin 31.3 ID-1: Fulcher (R) >99%, middle margin 31.3 WY-AL: Gray (R) >99%, middle margin 31.4 IL-10: Schneider (D) >99%, middle margin 31.6 PA-15: Thompson (R) >99%, middle margin 31.9 NY-25: Morelle (D) >99%, middle margin 32.0 AZ-7: Grijalva (D) >99%, middle margin 32.1 MO-6: Stigall (R) >99%, middle margin 32.1 KY-3: McGarvey (D) >99%, middle margin 32.5 WV-2: Moore (R) >99%, middle margin 32.7 AL-7: Sewell (D) >99%, middle margin 32.7 CT-4: Himes (D) >99%, middle margin 32.7 MO-7: Burlison (R) >99%, middle margin 32.8 MA-3: Trahan (D) >99%, middle margin 32.8 WV-1: Miller (R) >99%, middle margin 33.2 MS-1: Kelly (R) >99%, middle margin 33.2 CA-32: Sherman (D) >99%, middle margin 33.2 TX-7: Fletcher (D) >99%, middle margin 33.3 MA-4: Auchincloss (D) >99%, middle margin 33.7 CA-24: Carbajal (D) >99%, middle margin 33.7 CA-2: Huffman (D) >99%, middle margin 33.8 MS-2: Thompson (D) >99%, middle margin 33.8 MN-3: Morrison (D) >99%, middle margin 34.0 SC-6: Clyburn (D) >99%, middle margin 34.0 CA-28: Chu (D) >99%, middle margin 34.0 MO-5: Cleaver (D) >99%, middle margin 34.2 PA-13: Joyce (R) >99%, middle margin 34.3 KY-2: Guthrie (R) 100%, middle margin 34.7 MO-4: Alford (R) >99%, middle margin 34.7 CT-1: Bronin (D) >99%, middle margin 34.7 MD-3: Elfreth (D) >99%, middle margin 34.9 TX-13: Jackson (R) >99%, middle margin 35.0 SC-3: Biggs (R) >99%, middle margin 35.1 VA-9: Griffith (R) >99%, middle margin 35.5 NY-26: Kennedy (D) >99%, middle margin 35.6 MA-6: Koh (D) >99%, middle margin 35.8 OK-3: Lucas (R) >99%, middle margin 36.0 MS-4: Ezell (R) >99%, middle margin 36.1 AR-4: Westerman (R) >99%, middle margin 36.2 WA-2: Larsen (D) >99%, middle margin 36.2 MI-6: Dingell (D) >99%, middle margin 36.3 CA-18: Lofgren (D) >99%, middle margin 36.4 AL-3: Rogers (R) >99%, middle margin 36.7 IL-12: Bost (R) >99%, middle margin 36.8 UT-1: McAdams (D) >99%, middle margin 36.9 HI-2: Tokuda (D) >99%, middle margin 37.9 KY-1: Comer (R) >99%, middle margin 38.1 AR-1: Crawford (R) >99%, middle margin 38.5 TX-29: Garcia (D) >99%, middle margin 38.9 TX-20: Castro (D) >99%, middle margin 39.1 WA-1: DelBene (D) >99%, middle margin 39.2 TX-1: Moran (R) >99%, middle margin 39.4 HI-1: Case (D) >99%, middle margin 39.9 MA-8: Lynch (D) >99%, middle margin 40.0 PA-5: Scanlon (D) >99%, middle margin 40.4 VA-11: Walkinshaw (D) >99%, middle margin 42.1 TX-19: Sell (R) >99%, middle margin 42.1 IL-1: Jackson (D) >99%, middle margin 42.1 NY-14: Ocasio-Cortez (D) >99%, middle margin 42.4 CA-10: DeSaulnier (D) >99%, middle margin 42.6 IL-3: Ramirez (D) >99%, middle margin 42.8 MN-4: McCollum (D) >99%, middle margin 43.5 MD-5: Boafo (D) >99%, middle margin 43.7 IL-2: Miller (D) >99%, middle margin 43.7 CA-44: Barragán (D) >99%, middle margin 43.9 OK-2: Brecheen (R) >99%, middle margin 43.9 VA-4: McClellan (D) >99%, middle margin 44.0 TN-1: Harshbarger (R) >99%, middle margin 44.2 NY-16: Latimer (D) 100%, middle margin 44.3 CA-19: Panetta (D) >99%, middle margin 44.3 TX-33: Allred (D) >99%, middle margin 44.3 IL-5: Quigley (D) >99%, middle margin 44.4 FL-24: Gilbert (D) >99%, middle margin 44.5 CA-8: Garamendi (D) >99%, middle margin 44.7 IL-9: Biss (D) >99%, middle margin 44.8 OR-1: Bonamici (D) 100%, middle margin 44.8 NC-2: Ross (D) >99%, middle margin 45.0 FL-20: Schultz (D) >99%, middle margin 45.2 CA-36: Lieu (D) >99%, middle margin 45.7 MO-8: Smith (R) >99%, middle margin 46.0 VA-3: Scott (D) >99%, middle margin 46.2 PA-2: Boyle (D) >99%, middle margin 47.3 NE-3: Smith (R) >99%, middle margin 48.0 IN-7: Carson (D) >99%, middle margin 48.3 MI-12: Tlaib (D) >99%, middle margin 48.4 CO-2: Neguse (D) >99%, middle margin 48.5 GA-13: Clark (D) >99%, middle margin 49.1 TX-30: Haynes (D) >99%, middle margin 49.3 R+50 R+40 R+30 R+20 R+10 Even D+10 D+20 D+30 D+40 D+50 races within five points shaded Each dot is one district +2 beyond R+50 +37 beyond D+50
How to read it. Left of centre: Republican favoured; right: Democrat favoured. Faint dots are toss-ups or leaning races; solid ones are likely or safe. Districts beyond fifty points are counted at the edges.
Source. FutureBallot election-day House forecast, newest published run; districts with no contested forecast are not shown. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Forecast · Senate and governors
Since September 24, ten races moved toward Democrats or independents and two toward Republicans
Every Senate and governor race that was anything but safe at some point, and how its rating changed at three moments of the season. Thirteen kept their rating. Ratings come from the favourite's chance: toss-up below 60%, lean from 60% to 84%, likely from 85% to 94%, and safe at 95% or more.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Safe R Likely R Lean R Toss-up Lean D/I Likely D/I Safe D/I 1 race: Safe R → Likely R 1 race: Likely R → Safe R 1 race: Likely R → Likely R 1 race: Likely R → Lean R 4 races: Lean R → Lean R 1 race: Lean R → Toss-up 3 races: Toss-up → Lean D/I 3 races: Lean D/I → Toss-up 3 races: Lean D/I → Lean D/I 2 races: Lean D/I → Likely D/I 4 races: Likely D/I → Likely D/I 1 race: Safe D/I → Likely D/I 1 race: Safe R → Safe R 2 races: Likely R → Likely R 1 race: Lean R → Likely R 3 races: Lean R → Lean R 1 race: Lean R → Toss-up 2 races: Toss-up → Toss-up 2 races: Toss-up → Lean D/I 6 races: Lean D/I → Lean D/I 4 races: Likely D/I → Likely D/I 3 races: Likely D/I → Safe D/I Safe R 1 Likely R 3 Lean R 5 Toss-up 3 Lean D/I 8 Likely D/I 4 Safe D/I 1 September 24 1 2 5 4 6 7 October 13 Safe R 1 Likely R 3 Lean R 3 Toss-up 3 Lean D/I 8 Likely D/I 4 Safe D/I 3 November 2 How to read it. Each ribbon is a group of races with one rating at one moment and one at the next, the same or different; the ribbon's thickness shows how many races are in it. Ribbons that cross are rating changes. Races safe at all three moments are left out.
Source. FutureBallot election-day forecasts: the newest published run on each date. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Forecast · Senate and governors
In thirty-four of seventy-one Senate and governor races, either candidate can win inside the forecast's likely range
A forecast is a range, not a number. The pale band holds 90% of simulated results, the darker band the middle half, and the tick is the middle result. Wherever a band crosses the centre line, each colour is a way the race can end.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Democrat Republican Independent Pale band: 90% of simulations Dark band: the middle half Tick: middle result R+40 R+30 R+20 R+10 Even D+10 D+20 D+30 D+40 ← Republican or other ahead Democrat or independent ahead → WY Senate: Byrd (D) vs Hageman (R); middle of the range Hageman+37.1; 90% of simulations between Hageman+58.0 and Hageman+16.1 WY Senate Hageman (R) >99%, +37 WY Governor: Casner (D) vs Barlow (R); middle of the range Barlow+35.7; 90% of simulations between Barlow+54.3 and Barlow+17.2 WY Governor Barlow (R) >99%, +36 WV Senate: Anderson (D) vs Capito (R); middle of the range Capito+29.9; 90% of simulations between Capito+50.3 and Capito+9.6 WV Senate Capito (R) >99%, +30 ID Governor: Pickens (D) vs Little (R); middle of the range Little+25.8; 90% of simulations between Little+40.7 and Little+10.7 ID Governor Little (R) >99%, +26 OK Senate: Thomas (D) vs Hern (R); middle of the range Hern+24.0; 90% of simulations between Hern+38.5 and Hern+9.3 OK Senate Hern (R) >99%, +24 TN Senate: Bradshaw (D) vs Hagerty (R); middle of the range Hagerty+22.4; 90% of simulations between Hagerty+36.9 and Hagerty+7.7 TN Senate Hagerty (R) >99%, +22 SD Governor: Ahlers (D) vs Rhoden (R); middle of the range Rhoden+20.3; 90% of simulations between Rhoden+35.2 and Rhoden+5.2 SD Governor Rhoden (R) 99%, +20 AR Governor: Love (D) vs Sanders (R); middle of the range Sanders+17.2; 90% of simulations between Sanders+32.2 and Sanders+2.1 AR Governor Sanders (R) 97%, +17 AL Senate: Wess (D) vs Moore (R); middle of the range Moore+17.1; 90% of simulations between Moore+27.3 and Moore+6.7 AL Senate Moore (R) >99%, +17 ID Senate: Achilles (I) vs Risch (R); middle of the range Risch+17.0; 90% of simulations between Risch+31.5 and Risch+3.0 ID Senate Risch (R) 97%, +17 TN Governor: Green (D) vs Blackburn (R); middle of the range Blackburn+15.7; 90% of simulations between Blackburn+26.4 and Blackburn+4.9 TN Governor Blackburn (R) 99%, +16 AR Senate: Shoffner (D) vs Cotton (R); middle of the range Cotton+14.8; 90% of simulations between Cotton+29.8 and Shoffner+0.4 AR Senate Cotton (R) 95%, +15 KY Senate: Booker (D) vs Barr (R); middle of the range Barr+13.3; 90% of simulations between Barr+27.8 and Booker+1.5 KY Senate Barr (R) 93%, +13 MT Senate: Bodnar (I) vs Alme (R); middle of the range Alme+12.9; 90% of simulations between Alme+22.9 and Alme+2.3 MT Senate Alme (R) 97%, +13 AL Governor: Jones (D) vs Tuberville (R); middle of the range Tuberville+12.5; 90% of simulations between Tuberville+22.7 and Tuberville+2.3 AL Governor Tuberville (R) 97%, +12 LA Senate: Davis (D) vs Letlow (R); middle of the range Letlow+10.3; 90% of simulations between Letlow+24.8 and Davis+4.4 LA Senate Letlow (R) 88%, +10 SC Governor: Johnson (D) vs Wilson (R); middle of the range Wilson+10.3; 90% of simulations between Wilson+19.7 and Wilson+0.8 SC Governor Wilson (R) 96%, +10 OK Governor: Munson (D) vs Mazzei (R); middle of the range Mazzei+8.9; 90% of simulations between Mazzei+23.8 and Munson+6.2 OK Governor Mazzei (R) 84%, +8.9 MS Senate: Colom (D) vs Hyde-Smith (R); middle of the range Hyde-Smith+8.9; 90% of simulations between Hyde-Smith+19.1 and Colom+1.3 MS Senate Hyde-Smith (R) 93%, +8.9 SD Senate: Bengs (I) vs Rounds (R); middle of the range Rounds+8.4; 90% of simulations between Rounds+18.1 and Bengs+1.5 SD Senate Rounds (R) 92%, +8.4 VT Governor: Janoo (D) vs Scott (R); middle of the range Scott+8.3; 90% of simulations between Scott+18.7 and Janoo+2.2 VT Governor Scott (R) 91%, +8.3 NH Governor: Warmington (D) vs Ayotte (R); middle of the range Ayotte+8.3; 90% of simulations between Ayotte+17.6 and Warmington+1.0 NH Governor Ayotte (R) 93%, +8.3 FL Senate: Nixon (D) vs Moody (R); middle of the range Moody+5.7; 90% of simulations between Moody+14.8 and Nixon+3.5 FL Senate Moody (R) 86%, +5.7 NE Governor: Walz (D) vs Pillen (R); middle of the range Pillen+5.5; 90% of simulations between Pillen+14.7 and Walz+3.9 NE Governor Pillen (R) 85%, +5.5 FL Governor: Jolly (D) vs Donalds (R); middle of the range Donalds+3.6; 90% of simulations between Donalds+12.6 and Jolly+5.5 FL Governor Donalds (R) 77%, +3.6 TX Governor: Hinojosa (D) vs Abbott (R); middle of the range Abbott+3.1; 90% of simulations between Abbott+12.2 and Hinojosa+6.1 TX Governor Abbott (R) 73%, +3.1 SC Senate: Andrews (D) vs Graham (R); middle of the range Graham+3.0; 90% of simulations between Graham+12.2 and Andrews+6.4 SC Senate Graham (R) 72%, +3.0 KS Governor: Holscher (D) vs Masterson (R); middle of the range Masterson+1.5; 90% of simulations between Masterson+10.7 and Holscher+7.9 KS Governor Masterson (R) 61%, +1.5 NE Senate: Osborn (I) vs Ricketts (R); middle of the range Ricketts+0.8; 90% of simulations between Ricketts+9.9 and Osborn+8.3 NE Senate Ricketts (R) 57%, +0.8 NV Governor: Ford (D) vs Lombardo (R); middle of the range Lombardo+0.5; 90% of simulations between Lombardo+9.8 and Ford+9.1 NV Governor Lombardo (R) 54%, +0.5 IA Senate: Turek (D) vs Hinson (R); middle of the range Hinson+0.3; 90% of simulations between Hinson+9.4 and Turek+8.8 IA Senate Hinson (R) 52%, +0.3 KS Senate: Hamilton (D) vs Marshall (R); middle of the range Hamilton+0.4; 90% of simulations between Marshall+8.8 and Hamilton+9.7 KS Senate Hamilton (D) 53%, +0.4 AK Senate: Peltola (D) vs Sullivan (R); middle of the range Peltola+1.4; 90% of simulations between Sullivan+11.6 and Peltola+14.4 AK Senate Peltola (D) 57%, +1.4 GA Governor: Bottoms (D) vs Jackson (R); middle of the range Bottoms+1.5; 90% of simulations between Jackson+7.9 and Bottoms+11.0 GA Governor Bottoms (D) 62%, +1.5 ME Senate: Jackson (D) vs Collins (R); middle of the range Jackson+1.9; 90% of simulations between Collins+7.1 and Jackson+11.2 ME Senate Jackson (D) 66%, +1.9 TX Senate: Talarico (D) vs Paxton (R); middle of the range Talarico+2.2; 90% of simulations between Paxton+6.8 and Talarico+11.3 TX Senate Talarico (D) 68%, +2.2 OH Senate: Brown (D) vs Husted (R); middle of the range Brown+3.0; 90% of simulations between Husted+6.1 and Brown+12.2 OH Senate Brown (D) 73%, +3.0 OH Governor: Acton (D) vs Ramaswamy (R); middle of the range Acton+3.7; 90% of simulations between Ramaswamy+5.4 and Acton+13.0 OH Governor Acton (D) 77%, +3.7 WI Governor: Crowley (D) vs Tiffany (R); middle of the range Crowley+3.9; 90% of simulations between Tiffany+5.3 and Crowley+13.3 WI Governor Crowley (D) 78%, +3.9 MI Senate: El-Sayed (D) vs Rogers (R); middle of the range El-Sayed+4.2; 90% of simulations between Rogers+5.0 and El-Sayed+13.5 MI Senate El-Sayed (D) 80%, +4.2 OR Governor: Kotek (D) vs Drazan (R); middle of the range Kotek+5.4; 90% of simulations between Drazan+4.3 and Kotek+15.4 OR Governor Kotek (D) 84%, +5.4 IA Governor: Sand (D) vs Lahn (R); middle of the range Sand+5.6; 90% of simulations between Lahn+3.6 and Sand+14.7 IA Governor Sand (D) 86%, +5.6 MN Senate: Flanagan (D) vs Tafoya (R); middle of the range Flanagan+7.3; 90% of simulations between Tafoya+1.9 and Flanagan+16.5 MN Senate Flanagan (D) 91%, +7.3 NH Senate: Pappas (D) vs Sununu (R); middle of the range Pappas+7.8; 90% of simulations between Sununu+1.3 and Pappas+17.0 NH Senate Pappas (D) 93%, +7.8 NM Governor: Haaland (D) vs Hull (R); middle of the range Haaland+8.1; 90% of simulations between Hull+1.9 and Haaland+18.3 NM Governor Haaland (D) 92%, +8.1 MI Governor: Benson (D) vs James (R); middle of the range Benson+8.3; 90% of simulations between James+0.7 and Benson+17.6 MI Governor Benson (D) 94%, +8.3 AK Governor: Kreiss-Tomkins (D) vs Wilson (R); middle of the range Kreiss-Tomkins+9.6; 90% of simulations between Wilson+3.4 and Kreiss-Tomkins+22.6 AK Governor Kreiss-Tomkins (D) 89%, +9.6 GA Senate: Ossoff (D) vs Collins (R); middle of the range Ossoff+10.1; 90% of simulations between Ossoff+0.8 and Ossoff+19.5 GA Senate Ossoff (D) 96%, +10 NC Senate: Cooper (D) vs Whatley (R); middle of the range Cooper+10.5; 90% of simulations between Cooper+1.4 and Cooper+19.6 NC Senate Cooper (D) 97%, +10 MN Governor: Klobuchar (D) vs Demuth (R); middle of the range Klobuchar+10.8; 90% of simulations between Klobuchar+1.5 and Klobuchar+20.2 MN Governor Klobuchar (D) 97%, +11 AZ Governor: Hobbs (D) vs Biggs (R); middle of the range Hobbs+11.0; 90% of simulations between Hobbs+1.6 and Hobbs+20.7 AZ Governor Hobbs (D) 97%, +11 ME Governor: Pingree (D) vs Charles (R); middle of the range Pingree+11.6; 90% of simulations between Pingree+2.6 and Pingree+20.7 ME Governor Pingree (D) 98%, +12 NY Governor: Hochul (D) vs Blakeman (R); middle of the range Hochul+14.5; 90% of simulations between Hochul+5.1 and Hochul+24.1 NY Governor Hochul (D) 99%, +15 RI Governor: Foulkes (D) vs Block (I); middle of the range Foulkes+15.9; 90% of simulations between Foulkes+5.8 and Foulkes+25.8 RI Governor Foulkes (D) 99%, +16 NM Senate: Luján (D) vs Marker (R); middle of the range Luján+16.7; 90% of simulations between Luján+2.2 and Luján+31.4 NM Senate Luján (D) 97%, +17 IL Senate: Stratton (D) vs Tracy (R); middle of the range Stratton+17.8; 90% of simulations between Stratton+3.2 and Stratton+32.5 IL Senate Stratton (D) 98%, +18 CO Senate: Hickenlooper (D) vs Baisley (R); middle of the range Hickenlooper+18.0; 90% of simulations between Hickenlooper+3.5 and Hickenlooper+32.8 CO Senate Hickenlooper (D) 98%, +18 VA Senate: Warner (D) vs Mizusawa (R); middle of the range Warner+18.5; 90% of simulations between Warner+1.3 and Warner+35.7 VA Senate Warner (D) 96%, +18 CT Governor: Lamont (D) vs Fazio (R); middle of the range Lamont+19.1; 90% of simulations between Lamont+9.5 and Lamont+28.9 CT Governor Lamont (D) >99%, +19 NJ Senate: Booker (D) vs Murphy (R); middle of the range Booker+19.9; 90% of simulations between Murphy+0.6 and Booker+40.5 NJ Senate Booker (D) 94%, +20 IL Governor: Pritzker (D) vs Bailey (R); middle of the range Pritzker+20.2; 90% of simulations between Pritzker+10.3 and Pritzker+30.1 IL Governor Pritzker (D) >99%, +20 PA Governor: Shapiro (D) vs Garrity (R); middle of the range Shapiro+21.2; 90% of simulations between Shapiro+11.7 and Shapiro+30.9 PA Governor Shapiro (D) >99%, +21 CA Governor: Becerra (D) vs Hilton (R); middle of the range Becerra+23.9; 90% of simulations between Becerra+14.7 and Becerra+33.3 CA Governor Becerra (D) >99%, +24 CO Governor: Weiser (D) vs Marx (R); middle of the range Weiser+24.0; 90% of simulations between Weiser+3.4 and Weiser+44.6 CO Governor Weiser (D) 97%, +24 MA Governor: Healey (D) vs Minogue (R); middle of the range Healey+24.3; 90% of simulations between Healey+14.8 and Healey+33.8 MA Governor Healey (D) >99%, +24 RI Senate: Reed (D) vs McKay (R); middle of the range Reed+24.7; 90% of simulations between Reed+14.7 and Reed+35.0 RI Senate Reed (D) >99%, +25 MA Senate: Markey (D) vs Deaton (R); middle of the range Markey+26.3; 90% of simulations between Markey+16.8 and Markey+36.0 MA Senate Markey (D) >99%, +26 OR Senate: Merkley (D) vs Smith (R); middle of the range Merkley+26.6; 90% of simulations between Merkley+6.2 and Merkley+47.0 OR Senate Merkley (D) 98%, +27 DE Senate: Coons (D) vs Katz (R); middle of the range Coons+28.7; 90% of simulations between Coons+8.5 and Coons+49.0 DE Senate Coons (D) >99%, +29 MD Governor: Moore (D) vs Cox (R); middle of the range Moore+30.6; 90% of simulations between Moore+15.7 and Moore+45.7 MD Governor Moore (D) >99%, +31 HI Governor: Green (D) vs Cordery (R); middle of the range Green+32.9; 90% of simulations between Green+11.8 and Green+53.9 HI Governor Green (D) >99%, +33 Favourite: chance of winning, middle margin
How to read it. Races are sorted from the most Republican middle result at the top to the most Democratic at the bottom. Bands beyond forty points are cut at the edge.
Source. FutureBallot election-day forecast: 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 95th percentiles of the simulated margin, newest published run per race. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Forecast · Senate and House
How the forecast for the Senate has shifted, week by week
Each ridge is one week's forecast: every simulated count of Democratic seats, piled up. Blue is the part of the ridge at or above a majority, red the part below it. Newest at the bottom. Senate: Democrats win 51 or more seats, a majority, in 70% of simulations and fall short in 30% of simulations.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Democrats at a majority or above Democrats short of a majority Senate: Democratic seats 51 for a majority Oct 10 Oct 18 Oct 25 Nov 1 70% at 51 or more 30% below 51 45 50 55 60 How to read it. A ridge sliding right means more simulations with more Democratic seats; a ridge getting narrower means the forecast has grown more certain.
Source. FutureBallot election-day chamber forecasts: the newest published run on each date, one a week back from the latest. In the Senate, if Democrats hold fifty seats, Republicans control the chamber through the vice president's vote. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Forecast · what changed
ID Governor moved most in the last thirty days: 1.8 points toward Pickens, the largest part from the ground-up estimate
The races whose published forecasts moved most over the last thirty days, each move split into what caused it: new polls, the calendar moving on, changes to the model, the ground-up estimate, news events and an unexplained remainder. The parts add up exactly to the move; the dot is where each race ended up.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
New polls Time passing Model changes Ground-up estimate News events Unexplained 1 pt 1 pt 2 pts 2 pts Change in the expected margin, in points ← toward the candidate on the left toward the candidate on the right → ID Governor: net +1.8 points toward Pickens (D) in thirty days ID Governor Little (R) · Pickens (D) net 1.8 toward Pickens ME Senate: net +0.9 points toward Jackson (D) in thirty days ME Senate Collins (R) · Jackson (D) net 0.9 toward Jackson IL Senate: net -0.9 points toward Tracy (R) in thirty days IL Senate Tracy (R) · Stratton (D) net 0.9 toward Tracy RI Governor: net -0.8 points toward Block (I) in thirty days RI Governor Block (I) · Foulkes (D) net 0.8 toward Block OH Senate: net -0.6 points toward Husted (R) in thirty days OH Senate Husted (R) · Brown (D) net 0.6 toward Husted OK Senate: net +0.5 points toward Thomas (D) in thirty days OK Senate Hern (R) · Thomas (D) net 0.5 toward Thomas NE Senate: net -0.5 points toward Ricketts (R) in thirty days NE Senate Ricketts (R) · Osborn (I) net 0.5 toward Ricketts NH Governor: net +0.3 points toward Warmington (D) in thirty days NH Governor Ayotte (R) · Warmington (D) net 0.3 toward Warmington MD Governor: net +0.3 points toward Moore (D) in thirty days MD Governor Cox (R) · Moore (D) net 0.3 toward Moore IA Governor: net +0.2 points toward Sand (D) in thirty days IA Governor Lahn (R) · Sand (D) net 0.2 toward Sand KS Senate: net -0.1 points toward Marshall (R) in thirty days KS Senate Marshall (R) · Hamilton (D) net 0.1 toward Marshall
How to read it. Bars to the right moved the race toward the candidate named second; bars to the left toward the candidate named first. Long bars both ways mean causes that pulled against each other.
Source. FutureBallot forecast attribution (each published election-day move decomposed by re-running the model with one input changed at a time), margin in points. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Polls · who pays
FutureBallot's archive holds no independent poll for ten of the thirty closest races
The closest Senate, governor and House races, and every poll of each that FutureBallot holds, split by who paid for it. Campaign and partisan polls are released when they help, so a race known only through them is harder to read.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026 and the latest poll fieldwork date, November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Independent poll Sponsored by a partisan group A campaign's own poll WA-3: polls by who paid for them: independent 3, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0 WA-3 Perez (D) 52% IA-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0 IA-2 Mitchell (R) 52% MI-10: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0 MI-10 no independent poll Bouchard (R) 52% IA Senate: polls by who paid for them: independent 33, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 2 IA Senate Hinson (R) 52% NY-17: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0 NY-17 Lawler (R) 53% KS Senate: polls by who paid for them: independent 12, sponsored by a partisan group 4, a campaign's own 1 KS Senate Hamilton (D) 53% TX-35: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0 TX-35 De La Cruz (R) 53% NV Governor: polls by who paid for them: independent 7, sponsored by a partisan group 7, a campaign's own 1 NV Governor Lombardo (R) 54% CA-22: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0 CA-22 Valadao (R) 54% VA-1: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0 VA-1 Taylor (D) 55% MT-1: polls by who paid for them: independent 4, sponsored by a partisan group 5, a campaign's own 0 MT-1 Flint (R) 55% PA-8: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 0 PA-8 Cognetti (D) 55% WI-3: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 4, a campaign's own 0 WI-3 no independent poll Cooke (D) 56% KY-6: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 6, a campaign's own 1 KY-6 no independent poll Dembo (D) 56% MO-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 0 MO-2 Wagner (R) 56% FL-22: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0 FL-22 no independent poll Dandiya (D) 57% NE Senate: polls by who paid for them: independent 10, sponsored by a partisan group 5, a campaign's own 3 NE Senate Ricketts (R) 57% FL-9: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0 FL-9 no independent poll Green (R) 57% AK Senate: polls by who paid for them: independent 21, sponsored by a partisan group 7, a campaign's own 0 AK Senate Peltola (D) 57% ME-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 5, a campaign's own 1 ME-2 LePage (R) 58% CO-5: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 2 CO-5 no independent poll Crank (R) 58% MI-4: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 4, a campaign's own 0 MI-4 no independent poll Huizenga (R) 59% MI-7: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 0 MI-7 Lawrence (D) 60% NV-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 1 NV-2 no independent poll Flippo (R) 61% KS Governor: polls by who paid for them: independent 9, sponsored by a partisan group 2, a campaign's own 1 KS Governor Masterson (R) 61% GA Governor: polls by who paid for them: independent 16, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0 GA Governor Bottoms (D) 62% VA-2: polls by who paid for them: independent 1, sponsored by a partisan group 1, a campaign's own 0 VA-2 Luria (D) 62% OH-15: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 4, a campaign's own 0 OH-15 no independent poll Carey (R) 62% TX-15: polls by who paid for them: independent 2, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 0 TX-15 Pulido (D) 63% AZ-6: polls by who paid for them: independent 0, sponsored by a partisan group 3, a campaign's own 0 AZ-6 no independent poll Mendoza (D) 64% Favourite, chance Polls of the race this cycle 0 10 20 30 40
How to read it. Races are ordered with the closest at the top. Bar length is the number of polls.
Source. FutureBallot poll archive (the polls listed on the /polls pages), general-election questions this cycle; sponsor type as recorded from each release. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Money · Senate
Of the Senate races shown where the favourite's chance is below 90%, TX Senate has the most money behind it: $203 million so far
The chart shows what each campaign has raised and what outside groups have spent on its side, either for the candidate or against the opponent, in the eleven Senate races shown, those where the favourite's chance is below 90% and both candidates have campaign-finance records. Across all the races shown, campaign receipts and outside spending together come to $744 million.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026 and the latest campaign finance filing recorded, November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Raised by the campaign (solid) Outside groups on that side (paler) Democrat Republican Independent ← money on the Republican's side money on the Democrat's or independent's side → Millions of dollars: raised by each campaign, plus outside groups' spending on its side TX Senate: Paxton (R) raised $22.3M, outside groups spent $2.7M on that side; Talarico (D) raised $146.3M, outside groups spent $31.3M on that side TX Senate Paxton $25M Talarico $178M MI Senate: Rogers (R) raised $23.0M, outside groups spent $35.0M on that side; El-Sayed (D) raised $53.8M, outside groups spent $14.2M on that side MI Senate Rogers $58M El-Sayed $68M OH Senate: Husted (R) raised $19.9M, outside groups spent $9.3M on that side; Brown (D) raised $68.4M, outside groups spent $1.5M on that side OH Senate Husted $29M Brown $70M IA Senate: Hinson (R) raised $14.1M, outside groups spent $4.8M on that side; Turek (D) raised $24.3M, outside groups spent $20.4M on that side IA Senate Hinson $19M Turek $45M AK Senate: Sullivan (R) raised $11.5M, outside groups spent $4.6M on that side; Peltola (D) raised $36.9M, outside groups spent $3.0M on that side AK Senate Sullivan $16M Peltola $40M ME Senate: Collins (R) raised $22.5M, outside groups spent $2.5M on that side; Jackson (D) raised $26.9M, outside groups spent $3.3M on that side ME Senate Collins $25M Jackson $30M LA Senate: Letlow (R) raised $7.1M, outside groups spent $11.6M on that side; Davis (D) raised $5.0M, outside groups spent $10.9M on that side LA Senate Letlow $19M Davis $16M SC Senate: Graham (R) raised $1.9M, outside groups spent $2.8M on that side; Andrews (D) raised $24.2M, outside groups spent $0.1M on that side SC Senate Graham $5M Andrews $24M NE Senate: Ricketts (R) raised $14.5M, outside groups spent $0.9M on that side; Osborn (I) raised $11.0M, outside groups spent $0.1M on that side NE Senate Ricketts $15M Osborn $11M FL Senate: Moody (R) raised $14.5M, outside groups spent $0.6M on that side; Nixon (D) raised $11.3M, outside groups spent $0.1M on that side FL Senate Moody $15M Nixon $11M KS Senate: Marshall (R) raised $5.4M, outside groups spent $0.3M on that side; Hamilton (D) raised $19.2M, outside groups spent $0.0M on that side KS Senate Marshall $6M Hamilton $19M
How to read it. Solid: the campaign's own receipts. Paler: independent expenditures by outside groups on that candidate's side. Only races where both candidates' filings are linked are shown.
Source. Federal Election Commission filings as recorded by FutureBallot, newest record per candidate; millions of dollars. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Forecast · Senate
KS Senate rose furthest of the charted races on the list of closest Senate races (any place below fourteenth counted as fifteenth), from number eleven to number two
The twelve closest Senate races today, and where each ranked on the list of closest races in each of the last six weeks. Lines that cross are races trading places.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Democrat Republican Independent Sep 28 Oct 5 Oct 12 Oct 19 Oct 26 Nov 2 4. AK · Peltola (D) 57% AK 3 10. FL · Moody (R) 86% 1. IA · Hinson (R) 52% IA 6 2. KS · Hamilton (D) 53% KS 11 11. LA · Letlow (R) 88% 5. ME · Jackson (D) 66% ME 4 9. MI · El-Sayed (D) 80% MI 1 12. MN · Flanagan (D) 91% MN 8 3. NE · Ricketts (R) 57% NE 7 8. OH · Brown (D) 73% OH 5 7. SC · Graham (R) 72% SC 10 6. TX · Talarico (D) 68% TX 2 Rank, closest = 1 How to read it. Rank one is the race whose favourite's chance is nearest 50%. Lines start lower down or below the chart when a race was further from the top twelve.
Source. FutureBallot election-day Senate forecasts: the newest published run on or before each date. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Polls · the year
61% of this year's 1,253 polls finished on or after Labor Day; one of the busiest days was October 1, when twenty-eight polls finished
Every day from January 1, 2026 to November 1 as a square, darker when more polls of a Senate, governor or House race finished their fieldwork that day. The election season shows up as a wave of colour from September on.
Data as of the latest poll fieldwork date, November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
No polls 1–7 polls 8–14 polls 15–21 polls 22–27 polls 28 polls Jan 1: 0 polls Jan Jan 2: 0 polls Jan 3: 0 polls Jan 4: 0 polls Jan 5: 0 polls Jan 6: 2 polls Jan 7: 1 poll Jan 8: 1 poll Jan 9: 0 polls Jan 10: 0 polls Jan 11: 2 polls Jan 12: 2 polls Jan 13: 0 polls Jan 14: 0 polls Jan 15: 1 poll Jan 16: 0 polls Jan 17: 2 polls Jan 18: 0 polls Jan 19: 2 polls Jan 20: 0 polls Jan 21: 0 polls Jan 22: 0 polls Jan 23: 0 polls Jan 24: 0 polls Jan 25: 2 polls Jan 26: 0 polls Jan 27: 0 polls Jan 28: 1 poll Jan 29: 1 poll Jan 30: 1 poll Jan 31: 2 polls Feb 1: 0 polls Feb Feb 2: 2 polls Feb 3: 2 polls Feb 4: 3 polls Feb 5: 1 poll Feb 6: 0 polls Feb 7: 0 polls Feb 8: 2 polls Feb 9: 0 polls Feb 10: 0 polls Feb 11: 0 polls Feb 12: 1 poll Feb 13: 0 polls Feb 14: 0 polls Feb 15: 0 polls Feb 16: 5 polls Feb 17: 2 polls Feb 18: 1 poll Feb 19: 1 poll Feb 20: 0 polls Feb 21: 0 polls Feb 22: 3 polls Feb 23: 1 poll Feb 24: 0 polls Feb 25: 0 polls Feb 26: 2 polls Feb 27: 0 polls Feb 28: 0 polls Mar 1: 1 poll Mar Mar 2: 3 polls Mar 3: 0 polls Mar 4: 0 polls Mar 5: 1 poll Mar 6: 0 polls Mar 7: 0 polls Mar 8: 3 polls Mar 9: 0 polls Mar 10: 0 polls Mar 11: 1 poll Mar 12: 2 polls Mar 13: 1 poll Mar 14: 7 polls Mar 15: 0 polls Mar 16: 2 polls Mar 17: 2 polls Mar 18: 4 polls Mar 19: 1 poll Mar 20: 0 polls Mar 21: 0 polls Mar 22: 1 poll Mar 23: 2 polls Mar 24: 0 polls Mar 25: 0 polls Mar 26: 2 polls Mar 27: 0 polls Mar 28: 0 polls Mar 29: 1 poll Mar 30: 0 polls Mar 31: 2 polls Apr 1: 1 poll Apr Apr 2: 0 polls Apr 3: 0 polls Apr 4: 0 polls Apr 5: 0 polls Apr 6: 1 poll Apr 7: 1 poll Apr 8: 0 polls Apr 9: 6 polls Apr 10: 0 polls Apr 11: 0 polls Apr 12: 1 poll Apr 13: 2 polls Apr 14: 3 polls Apr 15: 0 polls Apr 16: 1 poll Apr 17: 0 polls Apr 18: 0 polls Apr 19: 1 poll Apr 20: 8 polls Apr 21: 2 polls Apr 22: 0 polls Apr 23: 1 poll Apr 24: 2 polls Apr 25: 1 poll Apr 26: 0 polls Apr 27: 1 poll Apr 28: 2 polls Apr 29: 4 polls Apr 30: 1 poll May 1: 1 poll May May 2: 1 poll May 3: 0 polls May 4: 0 polls May 5: 2 polls May 6: 1 poll May 7: 2 polls May 8: 1 poll May 9: 1 poll May 10: 0 polls May 11: 3 polls May 12: 1 poll May 13: 0 polls May 14: 0 polls May 15: 0 polls May 16: 1 poll May 17: 1 poll May 18: 0 polls May 19: 0 polls May 20: 1 poll May 21: 0 polls May 22: 0 polls May 23: 4 polls May 24: 1 poll May 25: 0 polls May 26: 1 poll May 27: 0 polls May 28: 3 polls May 29: 0 polls May 30: 1 poll May 31: 3 polls Jun 1: 4 polls Jun Jun 2: 1 poll Jun 3: 0 polls Jun 4: 8 polls Jun 5: 0 polls Jun 6: 0 polls Jun 7: 1 poll Jun 8: 0 polls Jun 9: 0 polls Jun 10: 2 polls Jun 11: 5 polls Jun 12: 4 polls Jun 13: 2 polls Jun 14: 2 polls Jun 15: 1 poll Jun 16: 3 polls Jun 17: 0 polls Jun 18: 0 polls Jun 19: 2 polls Jun 20: 1 poll Jun 21: 4 polls Jun 22: 1 poll Jun 23: 11 polls Jun 24: 2 polls Jun 25: 7 polls Jun 26: 1 poll Jun 27: 11 polls Jun 28: 5 polls Jun 29: 2 polls Jun 30: 4 polls Jul 1: 1 poll Jul Jul 2: 2 polls Jul 3: 0 polls Jul 4: 0 polls Jul 5: 0 polls Jul 6: 1 poll Jul 7: 1 poll Jul 8: 2 polls Jul 9: 1 poll Jul 10: 1 poll Jul 11: 3 polls Jul 12: 3 polls Jul 13: 4 polls Jul 14: 2 polls Jul 15: 2 polls Jul 16: 7 polls Jul 17: 5 polls Jul 18: 1 poll Jul 19: 2 polls Jul 20: 5 polls Jul 21: 1 poll Jul 22: 3 polls Jul 23: 2 polls Jul 24: 3 polls Jul 25: 0 polls Jul 26: 4 polls Jul 27: 5 polls Jul 28: 2 polls Jul 29: 3 polls Jul 30: 10 polls Jul 31: 5 polls Aug 1: 5 polls Aug Aug 2: 1 poll Aug 3: 2 polls Aug 4: 7 polls Aug 5: 2 polls Aug 6: 6 polls Aug 7: 2 polls Aug 8: 2 polls Aug 9: 5 polls Aug 10: 12 polls Aug 11: 2 polls Aug 12: 5 polls Aug 13: 10 polls Aug 14: 0 polls Aug 15: 2 polls Aug 16: 2 polls Aug 17: 8 polls Aug 18: 6 polls Aug 19: 0 polls Aug 20: 6 polls Aug 21: 3 polls Aug 22: 5 polls Aug 23: 6 polls Aug 24: 13 polls Aug 25: 1 poll Aug 26: 4 polls Aug 27: 2 polls Aug 28: 9 polls Aug 29: 1 poll Aug 30: 5 polls Aug 31: 8 polls Sep 1: 5 polls Sep Sep 2: 5 polls Sep 3: 7 polls Sep 4: 3 polls Sep 5: 1 poll Sep 6: 6 polls Sep 7: 3 polls Sep 8: 7 polls Sep 9: 8 polls Sep 10: 17 polls Sep 11: 9 polls Sep 12: 5 polls Sep 13: 7 polls Sep 14: 18 polls Sep 15: 8 polls Sep 16: 10 polls Sep 17: 12 polls Sep 18: 4 polls Sep 19: 6 polls Sep 20: 15 polls Sep 21: 24 polls Sep 22: 17 polls Sep 23: 11 polls Sep 24: 7 polls Sep 25: 6 polls Sep 26: 1 poll Sep 27: 18 polls Sep 28: 13 polls Sep 29: 9 polls Sep 30: 26 polls Oct 1: 28 polls Oct Oct 2: 2 polls Oct 3: 6 polls Oct 4: 22 polls Oct 5: 21 polls Oct 6: 10 polls Oct 7: 11 polls Oct 8: 16 polls Oct 9: 13 polls Oct 10: 7 polls Oct 11: 14 polls Oct 12: 16 polls Oct 13: 13 polls Oct 14: 28 polls Oct 15: 15 polls Oct 16: 9 polls Oct 17: 4 polls Oct 18: 20 polls Oct 19: 21 polls Oct 20: 27 polls Oct 21: 14 polls Oct 22: 23 polls Oct 23: 21 polls Oct 24: 7 polls Oct 25: 19 polls Oct 26: 18 polls Oct 27: 14 polls Oct 28: 20 polls Oct 29: 24 polls Oct 30: 8 polls Oct 31: 13 polls Nov 1: 24 polls Nov Labor Day 28 polls on Oct 1 Mon Wed Fri
How to read it. Columns are weeks; rows are days of the week. Shade is the number of polls ending that day, from none to the number on the busiest day of the year.
Source. FutureBallot poll archive (the polls listed on /polls), general-election questions, by the last day of fieldwork; a poll of several races counts once. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Polls · the year
Polling swelled from a trickle to 132 polls in its busiest week; 76% of this year's polls from January 5 on were independent
Every week from January 5, 2026 to the week of October 26, the number of Senate, governor and House polls that finished fieldwork, split by who paid for them, as a stream that widens with the volume.
Data as of the latest poll fieldwork date, November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Independent Sponsored by a partisan group A campaign's own poll 50 polls a week Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 132 polls, week of Oct 19 How to read it. The stream's thickness each week is the number of polls; the layers show who paid.
Source. FutureBallot poll archive (the polls listed on /polls), general-election questions, by the last day of fieldwork; a poll of several races counts once. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Forecast · Senate
Three Senate races changed favourite since September 24: IA, KS, NE
Every Senate race with at least five days of forecasts, one thin strip each, showing the forecast's chance day by day. The fill rises with the favourite's chance above 50%, in that favourite's colour; the darker layer starts at 75%. A strip that changes colour is a race that changed favourite.
Data as of the forecast published November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Democrat Republican Independent IA Senate Hinson (R) 52% KS Senate Hamilton (D) 53% NE Senate Ricketts (R) 57% AK Senate Peltola (D) 57% ME Senate Jackson (D) 66% TX Senate Talarico (D) 68% SC Senate Graham (R) 72% OH Senate Brown (D) 73% MI Senate El-Sayed (D) 80% FL Senate Moody (R) 86% LA Senate Letlow (R) 88% MN Senate Flanagan (D) 91% SD Senate Rounds (R) 92% NH Senate Pappas (D) 93% MS Senate Hyde-Smith (R) 93% KY Senate Barr (R) 93% NJ Senate Booker (D) 94% AR Senate Cotton (R) 95% GA Senate Ossoff (D) 96% VA Senate Warner (D) 96% NC Senate Cooper (D) 97% NM Senate Luján (D) 97% MT Senate Alme (R) 97% ID Senate Risch (R) 97% IL Senate Stratton (D) 98% CO Senate Hickenlooper (D) 98% OR Senate Merkley (D) 98% DE Senate Coons (D) >99% AL Senate Moore (R) >99% TN Senate Hagerty (R) >99% WV Senate Capito (R) >99% OK Senate Hern (R) >99% WY Senate Hageman (R) >99% RI Senate Reed (D) >99% MA Senate Markey (D) >99% Sep 24 Oct 1 Oct 8 Oct 15 Oct 22 Oct 29 Favourite today How to read it. Pale fill: favourite between 50% and 75%. Dark fill: 75% or more, rising to the top of the strip at 100%. Closest races at the top.
Source. FutureBallot election-day Senate forecasts: the newest published run on each date. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.
Money · Senate
Of the Senate races with both candidates' filings linked, the three with the most money hold 36% of the $1,269 million: TX, GA, MI
Every Senate race with both candidates' filings linked, as a block sized by all the money on both sides: what the campaigns raised and what outside groups spent for each. Each block is split by side, in each candidate's party colour.
Data as of the latest campaign finance filing recorded, November 1, 2026.
Swipe the chart sideways to see all of it.
Democrat Republican Independent TX Senate: $203M; Paxton (R) $25M, Talarico (D) $178M; favourite Talarico (D) 68% TX $203M GA Senate: $129M; Collins (R) $12M, Ossoff (D) $117M; favourite Ossoff (D) 96% GA $129M MI Senate: $126M; Rogers (R) $58M, El-Sayed (D) $68M; favourite El-Sayed (D) 80% MI $126M OH Senate: $99M; Husted (R) $29M, Brown (D) $70M; favourite Brown (D) 73% OH $99M NC Senate: $80M; Whatley (R) $21M, Cooper (D) $59M; favourite Cooper (D) 97% NC $80M IA Senate: $64M; Hinson (R) $19M, Turek (D) $45M; favourite Hinson (R) 52% IA $64M AK Senate: $56M; Sullivan (R) $16M, Peltola (D) $40M; favourite Peltola (D) 57% AK $56M ME Senate: $55M; Collins (R) $25M, Jackson (D) $30M; favourite Jackson (D) 66% ME $55M LA Senate: $35M; Letlow (R) $19M, Davis (D) $16M; favourite Letlow (R) 88% LA $35M NH Senate: $34M; Sununu (R) $10M, Pappas (D) $24M; favourite Pappas (D) 93% NH $34M MN Senate: $32M; Tafoya (R) $20M, Flanagan (D) $12M; favourite Flanagan (D) 91% MN $32M IL Senate: $32M; Tracy (R) $15M, Stratton (D) $16M; favourite Stratton (D) 98% IL $32M KY Senate: $30M; Barr (R) $20M, Booker (D) $10M; favourite Barr (R) 93% KY $30M SC Senate: $29M; Graham (R) $5M, Andrews (D) $24M; favourite Graham (R) 72% SC $29M NE Senate: $27M; Ricketts (R) $15M, Osborn (I) $11M; favourite Ricketts (R) 57% NE $27M FL Senate: $27M; Moody (R) $15M, Nixon (D) $11M; favourite Moody (R) 86% FL $27M KS Senate: $25M; Marshall (R) $6M, Hamilton (D) $19M; favourite Hamilton (D) 53% KS $25M VA Senate: $22M; Mizusawa (R) $1M, Warner (D) $20M; favourite Warner (D) 96% VA $22M NJ Senate: $21M; Murphy (R) $0M, Booker (D) $21M; favourite Booker (D) 94% NJ $21M AL Senate: $21M; Moore (R) $21M, Wess (D) $0M; favourite Moore (R) >99% AL $21M AR Senate: $14M; Cotton (R) $10M, Shoffner (D) $4M; favourite Cotton (R) 95% AR $14M OK Senate: $13M; Hern (R) $13M, Thomas (D) $0M; favourite Hern (R) >99% OK $13M MT Senate: $12M; Alme (R) $6M, Bodnar (I) $5M; favourite Alme (R) 97% MT $12M MS Senate: $11M; Hyde-Smith (R) $5M, Colom (D) $7M; favourite Hyde-Smith (R) 93% MS MA Senate: $11M; Deaton (R) $5M, Markey (D) $6M; favourite Markey (D) >99% MA CO Senate: $10M; Baisley (R) $0M, Hickenlooper (D) $10M; favourite Hickenlooper (D) 98% CO TN Senate: $9M; Hagerty (R) $9M, Bradshaw (D) $0M; favourite Hagerty (R) >99% TN NM Senate: $7M; Marker (R) $0M, Luján (D) $6M; favourite Luján (D) 97% NM SD Senate: $6M; Rounds (R) $4M, Bengs (I) $2M; favourite Rounds (R) 92% SD WV Senate: $6M; Capito (R) $6M, Anderson (D) $0M; favourite Capito (R) >99% WV ID Senate: $6M; Risch (R) $4M, Achilles (I) $2M; favourite Risch (R) 97% ID OR Senate: $6M; Smith (R) $0M, Merkley (D) $5M; favourite Merkley (D) 98% OR DE Senate: $5M; Katz (R) $0M, Coons (D) $5M; favourite Coons (D) >99% DE RI Senate: $4M; McKay (R) $0M, Reed (D) $4M; favourite Reed (D) >99% RI WY Senate: $4M; Hageman (R) $4M, Byrd (D) $0M; favourite Hageman (R) >99% WY
How to read it. Bigger block, more money. The split inside each block shows which side the money was on; the split is not the forecast.
Source. Federal Election Commission filings as recorded by FutureBallot, newest record per candidate; millions of dollars. Drawn November 2, 2026, 2:33 AM Pacific.
Link to this chart Chart image page Download the data (CSV) Free to republish with credit to FutureBallot.