Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota House

Minnesota House District 53A

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

99% chance of a Democratic win · Aj Gubash (R), Mary Frances Clardy (D)

Minnesota House District 53A: ForecastMinnesota House 41B: chance of a Democratic win 60%; 2024 president R+2Minnesota House 52B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+31Minnesota House 53B: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+13Minnesota House 56B: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+15Minnesota House 58B: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+20Minnesota House 64B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+66Minnesota House 65B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+55Minnesota House District 53A: Forecast65B56B41B58B53A
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 53A is safe Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans, 1 is competitive.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+11 to D+33, middle D+22
CandidatesAj Gubash (R), Mary Frances Clardy (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberMary Clardy

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+14
Governor 2022D+20
Legislature 2024D+16
President 2024D+21
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$92,021$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)46%39%
Median age4339
White (not Hispanic)73%77%
Black5%7%
Hispanic15%6%
Asian4%5%
Born abroad10%9%
Jobs in manufacturing8%13%
Jobs in farming or mining0%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.