Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota House

Minnesota House District 64B

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

Decided: only a Democrat is running · Dave Pinto (D)

Minnesota House District 64B: Decided: only a Democrat is runningMinnesota House 51A: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+50Minnesota House 52B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+31Minnesota House 53A: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+21Minnesota House 63A: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+81Minnesota House 63B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+77Minnesota House 64A: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+73Minnesota House 65B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+55Minnesota House District 64B: Decided: only a Democrat is running64A63A63B65B51A52B53A64B
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 64B is safe Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 7 favour Democrats.

StatusDecided: only a Democrat is running
CandidatesDave Pinto (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberDave Pinto

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+65
Governor 2022D+67
Legislature 2024D+60
President 2024D+66
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$84,451$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)60%39%
Median age4039
White (not Hispanic)75%77%
Black11%7%
Hispanic5%6%
Asian4%5%
Born abroad12%9%
Jobs in manufacturing10%13%
Jobs in farming or mining0%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.