Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota House

Minnesota House District 41B

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

60% chance of a Democratic win · Jen Fox (D), William Beck (R)

Minnesota House District 41B: ForecastMinnesota House 41A: chance of a Democratic win 45%; 2024 president D+4Minnesota House 53A: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+21Minnesota House 53B: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+13Minnesota House 58B: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+20Wisconsin Assembly 29: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+28Wisconsin Assembly 30: chance of a Democratic win 18%; 2024 president R+5Minnesota House District 41B: Forecast53B41AWI 3058BWI 2941B
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 41B is competitive. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 3 favour Republicans, 1 is competitive. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win60%
Likely margin (80% range)R+9 to D+14, middle D+2
CandidatesJen Fox (D), William Beck (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberTom Dippel

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+2
Governor 2022D+3
Legislature 2024R+2
President 2024R+2
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$105,509$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)33%39%
Median age4039
White (not Hispanic)81%77%
Black4%7%
Hispanic6%6%
Asian4%5%
Born abroad5%9%
Jobs in manufacturing15%13%
Jobs in farming or mining1%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.