Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › New York Assembly

New York Assembly District 94

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

1% chance of a Democratic win · Daniel Guzman (D), Matthew J. Slater (R)

New York Assembly District 94: ForecastConnecticut House 108: chance of a Democratic win 9%; 2024 president R+4Connecticut House 111: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+28Connecticut House 138: chance of a Democratic win 89%; 2024 president D+5Connecticut House 2: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+12New York Assembly 105: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president R+10New York Assembly 93: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+30New York Assembly 95: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+28New York Assembly District 94: ForecastCT 2CT 111CT 108959310594
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 94 is safe Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans. 4 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+32 to R+10, middle R+21
CandidatesDaniel Guzman (D), Matthew J. Slater (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberMatt Slater

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+25
Governor 2022R+20
Legislature 2024R+25
President 2024R+13
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNew York
Median household income$134,596$84,578
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)49%40%
Median age4540
White (not Hispanic)72%53%
Black3%14%
Hispanic18%20%
Asian3%9%
Born abroad14%23%
Jobs in manufacturing5%6%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.