Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota Senate

Minnesota Senate District 58

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

28% chance of a Democratic win · Mark Legvold (D), Bill Lieske (R)

Minnesota Senate District 58: ForecastMinnesota Senate 19: chance of a Democratic win <1%Minnesota Senate 20: chance of a Democratic win 3%Minnesota Senate 22: chance of a Democratic win 7%Minnesota Senate 41: chance of a Democratic win 85%Minnesota Senate 53: chance of a Democratic win 98%Minnesota Senate 54: chance of a Democratic win 18%Minnesota Senate 56: chance of a Democratic win 98%Minnesota Senate 57: chance of a Democratic win 4%Wisconsin Senate 10: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+20Minnesota Senate District 58: Forecast5653575441192022WI 1058
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 58 leans Republican. Of its 9 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 6 favour Republicans. 1 of them is across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win28%
Likely margin (80% range)R+16 to D+6, middle R+5
CandidatesMark Legvold (D), Bill Lieske (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberBill Lieske

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+6
Governor 2022R+2
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$110,682$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)38%39%
Median age3639
White (not Hispanic)86%77%
Black2%7%
Hispanic6%6%
Asian2%5%
Born abroad5%9%
Jobs in manufacturing13%13%
Jobs in farming or mining2%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.