Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota Senate

Minnesota Senate District 54

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

18% chance of a Democratic win · Rick Olson (D), Ben Bakeberg (R)

Minnesota Senate District 54: ForecastMinnesota Senate 17: chance of a Democratic win <1%Minnesota Senate 22: chance of a Democratic win 7%Minnesota Senate 48: chance of a Democratic win 19%Minnesota Senate 49: chance of a Democratic win 99%Minnesota Senate 55: chance of a Democratic win 97%Minnesota Senate 57: chance of a Democratic win 4%Minnesota Senate 58: chance of a Democratic win 28%Minnesota Senate District 54: Forecast49574858172254
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 54 leans Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 5 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win18%
Likely margin (80% range)R+19 to D+3, middle R+8
CandidatesRick Olson (D), Ben Bakeberg (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberEric Pratt

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+13
Governor 2022R+2
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$116,682$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)42%39%
Median age3739
White (not Hispanic)73%77%
Black5%7%
Hispanic8%6%
Asian8%5%
Born abroad12%9%
Jobs in manufacturing15%13%
Jobs in farming or mining1%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.