Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota House

Minnesota House District 34A

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

23% chance of a Democratic win · Danny Nadeau (R), Jason Heaser (D)

Minnesota House District 34A: ForecastMinnesota House 30A: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+25Minnesota House 30B: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+27Minnesota House 31A: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+18Minnesota House 34B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+28Minnesota House 35A: chance of a Democratic win 91%; 2024 president D+4Minnesota House 37A: chance of a Democratic win 16%; 2024 president evenMinnesota House 37B: chance of a Democratic win 97%; 2024 president D+18Minnesota House District 34A: Forecast35A34B37B31A30B30A37A34A
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 34A leans Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 4 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win23%
Likely margin (80% range)R+17 to D+5, middle R+6
CandidatesDanny Nadeau (R), Jason Heaser (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberDanny Nadeau

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+7
Governor 2022even
Legislature 2024R+7
President 2024D+1
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$129,306$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)43%39%
Median age4039
White (not Hispanic)80%77%
Black8%7%
Hispanic4%6%
Asian4%5%
Born abroad8%9%
Jobs in manufacturing20%13%
Jobs in farming or mining0%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.