Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota House

Minnesota House District 31A

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

2% chance of a Democratic win · Brian Walker (D), Harry Niska (R)

Minnesota House District 31A: ForecastMinnesota House 30B: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+27Minnesota House 31B: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+34Minnesota House 34A: chance of a Democratic win 23%; 2024 president D+1Minnesota House 35A: chance of a Democratic win 91%; 2024 president D+4Minnesota House 35B: chance of a Democratic win 86%; 2024 president D+3Minnesota House District 31A: Forecast35B35A34A30B31B31A
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 31A is safe Republican. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 3 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win2%
Likely margin (80% range)R+31 to R+9, middle R+20
CandidatesBrian Walker (D), Harry Niska (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberHarry Niska

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+19
Governor 2022R+16
Legislature 2024R+22
President 2024R+18
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$114,828$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)33%39%
Median age3839
White (not Hispanic)85%77%
Black6%7%
Hispanic1%6%
Asian3%5%
Born abroad6%9%
Jobs in manufacturing16%13%
Jobs in farming or mining1%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.