Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan Senate

Michigan Senate District 19

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

99% chance of a Democratic win · Julie M. Rogers (D), Shaun Young (R)

Michigan Senate District 19: ForecastMichigan Senate 17: chance of a Democratic win <1%Michigan Senate 18: chance of a Democratic win 1%Michigan Senate 20: chance of a Democratic win 4%Michigan Senate District 19: Forecast18201719
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 19 is safe Democratic. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+10 to D+33, middle D+22
CandidatesJulie M. Rogers (D), Shaun Young (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberSean McCann

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+20
Governor 2022D+26
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$71,097$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)41%32%
Median age3540
White (not Hispanic)76%73%
Black10%13%
Hispanic6%6%
Asian3%3%
Born abroad6%7%
Jobs in manufacturing18%18%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.