Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan Senate

Michigan Senate District 17

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Ashleigh Baker (D), Jonathan Lindsey (R)

Michigan Senate District 17: ForecastIndiana Senate 10: not up in 2026 (held by democrat); 2024 president D+10Indiana Senate 11: chance of a Democratic win 7%Indiana Senate 13: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+49Indiana Senate 4: chance of a Democratic win 96%Indiana Senate 8: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+27Michigan Senate 14: chance of a Democratic win 91%Michigan Senate 16: chance of a Democratic win 1%Michigan Senate 18: chance of a Democratic win 1%Michigan Senate 19: chance of a Democratic win 99%Michigan Senate 20: chance of a Democratic win 4%Michigan Senate 21: chance of a Democratic win 99%Ohio Senate 1: chance of a Democratic win <1%Michigan Senate District 17: ForecastIN 10IN 4192114IN 13IN 8181620OH 117
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 17 is safe Republican. Of its 12 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 7 favour Republicans. 6 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+39 to R+16, middle R+28
CandidatesAshleigh Baker (D), Jonathan Lindsey (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberJonathan Lindsey

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+31
Governor 2022R+21
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$63,666$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)21%32%
Median age4240
White (not Hispanic)84%73%
Black4%13%
Hispanic6%6%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad4%7%
Jobs in manufacturing26%18%
Jobs in farming or mining3%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.