Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Massachusetts House

Massachusetts House District 7th Worcester

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

3% chance of a Democratic win · Nicholas Lazzaro (D), Paul K. Frost (R)

Massachusetts House District 7th Worcester: ForecastMassachusetts House 16th Worcester: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+20Massachusetts House 17th Worcester: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+18Massachusetts House 18th Worcester: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+10Massachusetts House 6th Worcester: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+7Massachusetts House 9th Worcester: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president D+13Massachusetts House District 7th Worcester: Forecast17th Worcester9th Worcester6th Worcester18th Worcester7th Worcester
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 7th Worcester is safe Republican. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 3 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win3%
Likely margin (80% range)R+62 to R+16, middle R+39
CandidatesNicholas Lazzaro (D), Paul K. Frost (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberPaul Frost

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024no two-party contest; won by Paul K Frost (Republican)
President 2024even
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMassachusetts
Median household income$108,039$101,341
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)36%47%
Median age4540
White (not Hispanic)87%68%
Black1%7%
Hispanic5%13%
Asian3%7%
Born abroad7%18%
Jobs in manufacturing8%9%
Jobs in farming or mining0%0%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.