Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Wisconsin Assembly

Wisconsin Assembly District 49

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

1% chance of a Democratic win · Travis Tranel (R), John Rindy (D)

Wisconsin Assembly District 49: ForecastIowa House 64: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+35Iowa House 65: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+26Iowa House 71: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+8Iowa House 72: chance of a Democratic win 21%; 2024 president R+1Illinois House 89: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+30Wisconsin Assembly 41: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+18Wisconsin Assembly 51: chance of a Democratic win 35%; 2024 president D+4Wisconsin Assembly 96: chance of a Democratic win 88%; 2024 president D+8Wisconsin Assembly District 49: ForecastIA 659641IA 6451IL 8949
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 49 is safe Republican. Of its 8 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 5 favour Republicans, 1 is competitive. 5 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+35 to R+13, middle R+24
CandidatesTravis Tranel (R), John Rindy (D)
Candidate list fromwikipedia
Current memberTravis Tranel

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+26
President 2024R+17
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtWisconsin
Median household income$65,120$75,670
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)24%33%
Median age3840
White (not Hispanic)93%79%
Black2%6%
Hispanic2%8%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad1%5%
Jobs in manufacturing16%18%
Jobs in farming or mining8%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.