Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Iowa House

Iowa House District 64

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

3% chance of a Democratic win · Jason Gearhart (R), Brian Bruening (D)

Iowa House District 64: ForecastIowa House 63: chance of a Democratic win 5%; 2024 president R+18Iowa House 65: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+26Iowa House 67: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+33Iowa House 68: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+31Minnesota House 26B: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+23Wisconsin Assembly 49: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+17Wisconsin Assembly 96: chance of a Democratic win 88%; 2024 president D+8Iowa House District 64: Forecast65WI 96676863WI 49MN 26B64
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 64 is safe Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 6 favour Republicans. 3 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win3%
Likely margin (80% range)R+61 to R+15, middle R+38
CandidatesJason Gearhart (R), Brian Bruening (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberJason Gearhart

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+38
Governor 2022R+43
Legislature 2024no two-party contest; won by Jason Gearhart (Republican)
President 2024R+35
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtIowa
Median household income$64,544$73,147
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)18%31%
Median age4439
White (not Hispanic)92%83%
Black1%4%
Hispanic5%7%
Asian0%2%
Born abroad4%6%
Jobs in manufacturing14%15%
Jobs in farming or mining11%4%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.