Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Vermont House

Vermont House District Lamoille-3

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

91% chance of a Democratic win · Adam Howard (independent), Deb Nevil (D), Rebecca Pitre (R)

Vermont House District Lamoille-3: ForecastVermont House Chittenden-25: chance of a Democratic win 29%; 2024 president D+53Vermont House Chittenden-3: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+55Vermont House Franklin-1: chance of a Democratic win 95%; 2024 president D+13Vermont House Franklin-6: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president D+14Vermont House Lamoille-1: decided: no democrat or republican is runningVermont House Lamoille-2: chance of a Democratic win 83%; 2024 president D+31Vermont House Lamoille-Washington: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+47Vermont House District Lamoille-3: ForecastChittenden-25Franklin-1Chittenden-3Franklin-6Lamoille-WashingtonLamoille-3
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District Lamoille-3 is likely Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 4 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans, 1 has no 2026 forecast.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win91%
Likely margin (80% range)even to D+23, middle D+12
CandidatesAdam Howard (independent), Deb Nevil (D), Rebecca Pitre (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberLucy Boyden

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+9
President 2024D+39
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtVermont
Median household income$77,321$78,024
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)46%43%
Median age3743
White (not Hispanic)91%91%
Black2%1%
Hispanic2%2%
Asian0%2%
Born abroad3%4%
Jobs in manufacturing10%10%
Jobs in farming or mining3%3%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.