Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Vermont House

Vermont House District Lamoille-2

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

83% chance of a Democratic win · Richard J. Bailey (R), James "Jim" Lipinski (D), Daniel Noyes (D), Malcolm "Mac" Teale (R)

Vermont House District Lamoille-2: Elects 2: expected Democratic seats 1.3Vermont House Caledonia-2: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president D+21Vermont House Franklin-6: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president D+14Vermont House Franklin-7: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president D+6Vermont House Lamoille-3: chance of a Democratic win 91%; 2024 president D+39Vermont House Lamoille-Washington: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+47Vermont House Orleans-4: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+30Vermont House Orleans-Lamoille: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+13Vermont House District Lamoille-2: Elects 2: expected Democratic seats 1.3Franklin-6Orleans-4Lamoille-WashingtonOrleans-LamoilleLamoille-2
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District Lamoille-2 leans Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 4 favour Republicans.

StatusElects 2: expected Democratic seats 1.3
Chance of a Democratic win83%
Likely margin (80% range)R+6 to D+16, middle D+5
CandidatesRichard J. Bailey (R), James "Jim" Lipinski (D), Daniel Noyes (D), Malcolm "Mac" Teale (R)
Candidate list fromofficial

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+1
President 2024D+31
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtVermont
Median household income$66,287$78,024
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)34%43%
Median age3943
White (not Hispanic)94%91%
Black2%1%
Hispanic2%2%
Asian0%2%
Born abroad1%4%
Jobs in manufacturing8%10%
Jobs in farming or mining2%3%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.