Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Texas House

Texas House District 85

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

4% chance of a Democratic win · Lawrence Brandyburg (D), Dennis "Goose" Geesaman (R)

Texas House District 85: ForecastTexas House 12: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+50Texas House 130: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+34Texas House 132: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+14Texas House 17: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+32Texas House 25: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+20Texas House 26: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+16Texas House 27: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+36Texas House 28: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+17Texas House 3: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+53Texas House 30: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+55Texas House 44: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+32Texas House District 85: Forecast27132328254417123085
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 85 is safe Republican. Of its 11 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 10 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win4%
Likely margin (80% range)R+59 to R+12, middle R+36
CandidatesLawrence Brandyburg (D), Dennis "Goose" Geesaman (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberStan Kitzman

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+51
Governor 2022R+48
Legislature 2024uncontested (R)
President 2024R+42
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtTexas
Median household income$77,304$76,292
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)30%33%
Median age3936
White (not Hispanic)47%40%
Black14%12%
Hispanic29%39%
Asian7%5%
Born abroad14%17%
Jobs in manufacturing12%9%
Jobs in farming or mining6%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.