Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Texas House

Texas House District 41

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

86% chance of a Democratic win · Julio Salinas (D), Gary Groves (R)

Texas House District 41: ForecastTexas House 35: chance of a Democratic win 97%; 2024 president R+7Texas House 36: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president R+6Texas House 40: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president evenTexas House District 41: Forecast36403541
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 41 is likely Democratic. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win86%
Likely margin (80% range)R+2 to D+21, middle D+9
CandidatesJulio Salinas (D), Gary Groves (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberBobby Guerra

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+14
Governor 2022D+16
Legislature 2024D+7
President 2024R+2
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtTexas
Median household income$62,244$76,292
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)33%33%
Median age3436
White (not Hispanic)10%40%
Black1%12%
Hispanic86%39%
Asian3%5%
Born abroad24%17%
Jobs in manufacturing5%9%
Jobs in farming or mining2%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.