Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Texas House

Texas House District 145

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

99% chance of a Democratic win · Christina Morales (D), Inocensia Moreno (R)

Texas House District 145: ForecastTexas House 134: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+26Texas House 139: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+39Texas House 140: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+17Texas House 142: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+38Texas House 143: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+14Texas House 144: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president R+3Texas House 147: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+52Texas House 148: chance of a Democratic win 96%; 2024 president D+9Texas House District 145: Forecast134147139148140144143142145
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 145 is safe Democratic. Of its 8 neighbouring districts, 8 favour Democrats.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+31 to D+77, middle D+54
CandidatesChristina Morales (D), Inocensia Moreno (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberChristina Morales

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+43
Governor 2022D+33
Legislature 2024uncontested (D)
President 2024D+33
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtTexas
Median household income$68,471$76,292
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)34%33%
Median age3536
White (not Hispanic)25%40%
Black9%12%
Hispanic60%39%
Asian3%5%
Born abroad25%17%
Jobs in manufacturing8%9%
Jobs in farming or mining3%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.