Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › South Carolina House

South Carolina House District 91

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

78% chance of a Democratic win · Daniel Alexander (R), Lonnie Hosey (D)

South Carolina House District 91: ForecastGeorgia House 126: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+19Georgia House 159: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+44South Carolina House 122: chance of a Democratic win 21%; 2024 president R+4South Carolina House 86: chance of a Democratic win 5%; 2024 president R+35South Carolina House 90: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+13South Carolina House 93: chance of a Democratic win 92%; 2024 president D+3South Carolina House 96: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president R+42South Carolina House District 91: Forecast96938690GA 159GA 12612291
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 91 leans Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 4 favour Republicans. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win78%
Likely margin (80% range)R+5 to D+18, middle D+7
CandidatesDaniel Alexander (R), Lonnie Hosey (D)
Candidate list fromofficial

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022uncontested (D)
Governor 2022D+1
Legislature 2024D+3
President 2024R+1
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtSouth Carolina
Median household income$42,998$66,818
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)15%31%
Median age4240
White (not Hispanic)41%62%
Black50%25%
Hispanic5%7%
Asian1%2%
Born abroad2%6%
Jobs in manufacturing17%13%
Jobs in farming or mining4%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.