Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › South Carolina House

South Carolina House District 19

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

5% chance of a Democratic win · Patrick B Haddon (R), Rachel Smith (D)

South Carolina House District 19: ForecastSouth Carolina House 17: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+54South Carolina House 20: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+34South Carolina House 22: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+13South Carolina House 23: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+23South Carolina House 4: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+70South Carolina House 5: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+49South Carolina House District 19: Forecast2220541719
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 19 is likely Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 5 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win5%
Likely margin (80% range)R+54 to R+7, middle R+31
CandidatesPatrick B Haddon (R), Rachel Smith (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberPatrick Haddon

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022uncontested (R)
Governor 2022R+21
Legislature 2024uncontested (R)
President 2024R+19
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtSouth Carolina
Median household income$60,954$66,818
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)30%31%
Median age3640
White (not Hispanic)62%62%
Black13%25%
Hispanic19%7%
Asian1%2%
Born abroad13%6%
Jobs in manufacturing12%13%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.