Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › South Carolina House

South Carolina House District 115

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

79% chance of a Democratic win · Johnnie Garmon (R), Nick Uricchio (D)

South Carolina House District 115: ForecastSouth Carolina House 110: chance of a Democratic win 10%; 2024 president R+3South Carolina House 112: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+13South Carolina House 116: chance of a Democratic win 39%; 2024 president R+1South Carolina House 119: chance of a Democratic win 93%; 2024 president D+8South Carolina House District 115: Forecast110119112116115
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 115 leans Democratic. Of its 4 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 2 favour Republicans, 1 is competitive.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win79%
Likely margin (80% range)R+4 to D+18, middle D+7
CandidatesJohnnie Garmon (R), Nick Uricchio (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberSpencer Wetmore

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+8
Governor 2022D+11
Legislature 2024D+4
President 2024D+4
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtSouth Carolina
Median household income$101,124$66,818
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)58%31%
Median age4540
White (not Hispanic)78%62%
Black13%25%
Hispanic4%7%
Asian2%2%
Born abroad5%6%
Jobs in manufacturing5%13%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.