Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Pennsylvania House

Pennsylvania House District 169

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

3% chance of a Democratic win · Austin Graham (D), Kate A Klunk (R)

Pennsylvania House District 169: ForecastMaryland House 42A: chance of a Democratic win 9%Maryland House 42C: chance of a Democratic win 7%Maryland House 5: chance of a Democratic win 5%Pennsylvania House 193: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+38Pennsylvania House 196: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+34Pennsylvania House 91: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+30Pennsylvania House 93: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+26Pennsylvania House District 169: Forecast19693MD 42A91MD 5193169
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 169 is safe Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 7 favour Republicans. 3 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win3%
Likely margin (80% range)R+64 to R+17, middle R+41
CandidatesAustin Graham (D), Kate A Klunk (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberKate Klunk

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+43
Governor 2022R+17
Legislature 2024uncontested (R)
President 2024R+33
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtPennsylvania
Median household income$82,738$76,081
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)27%34%
Median age4241
White (not Hispanic)87%74%
Black2%10%
Hispanic6%8%
Asian1%4%
Born abroad3%7%
Jobs in manufacturing17%11%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.