Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Pennsylvania House

Pennsylvania House District 111

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

2% chance of a Democratic win · Jonathan Fritz (R), Kyle Devlin (D)

Pennsylvania House District 111: ForecastNew York Assembly 100: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+22New York Assembly 101: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+10New York Assembly 121: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+23New York Assembly 123: chance of a Democratic win 95%New York Assembly 124: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+16Pennsylvania House 110: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+41Pennsylvania House 112: chance of a Democratic win 97%; 2024 president D+1Pennsylvania House 114: chance of a Democratic win 97%; 2024 president D+7Pennsylvania House 139: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+32Pennsylvania House District 111: ForecastNY 123112139NY 100NY 124110NY 101NY 121111
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 111 is safe Republican. Of its 9 neighbouring districts, 4 favour Democrats, 5 favour Republicans. 5 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win2%
Likely margin (80% range)R+67 to R+21, middle R+44
CandidatesJonathan Fritz (R), Kyle Devlin (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberJonathan Fritz

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022uncontested (R)
Governor 2022R+29
Legislature 2024uncontested (R)
President 2024R+42
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtPennsylvania
Median household income$63,908$76,081
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)20%34%
Median age4841
White (not Hispanic)91%74%
Black2%10%
Hispanic4%8%
Asian0%4%
Born abroad2%7%
Jobs in manufacturing10%11%
Jobs in farming or mining5%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.