Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Oregon Senate

Oregon Senate District 11

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

52% chance of a Democratic win · Tracy M Cramer (R), Virginia Stapleton (D)

Oregon Senate District 11: ForecastOregon Senate 10: chance of a Democratic win 96%Oregon Senate 12: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+5Oregon Senate 9: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president evenOregon Senate District 11: Forecast1012911
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 11 is competitive. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win52%
Likely margin (80% range)R+11 to D+12, middle even
CandidatesTracy M Cramer (R), Virginia Stapleton (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberKim Thatcher

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+5
Governor 2022R+19
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtOregon
Median household income$65,085$80,426
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)19%36%
Median age3440
White (not Hispanic)50%72%
Black1%2%
Hispanic41%14%
Asian2%4%
Born abroad19%10%
Jobs in manufacturing11%11%
Jobs in farming or mining6%3%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.