Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › North Carolina Senate

North Carolina Senate District 50

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Tom Downing (D), Kevin Corbin (R)

North Carolina Senate District 50: ForecastGeorgia Senate 50: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+64Georgia Senate 51: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+65North Carolina Senate 46: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+32North Carolina Senate 47: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+30North Carolina Senate 48: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+26South Carolina Senate 1: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+45South Carolina Senate 2: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+57South Carolina Senate 5: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+52Tennessee Senate 2: not up in 2026 (held by republican); 2024 president R+56Tennessee Senate 9: chance of a Democratic win <1%North Carolina Senate District 50: ForecastSC 5SC 14846TN 2TN 9GA 50GA 514750
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 50 is safe Republican. Of its 10 neighbouring districts, 10 favour Republicans. 7 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+41 to R+19, middle R+30
CandidatesTom Downing (D), Kevin Corbin (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberKevin Corbin

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+33
President 2024R+30
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNorth Carolina
Median household income$55,173$69,904
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)29%35%
Median age4839
White (not Hispanic)85%61%
Black2%20%
Hispanic6%11%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad4%9%
Jobs in manufacturing7%12%
Jobs in farming or mining2%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.