Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › North Carolina Senate

North Carolina Senate District 30

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Pamela D. McAfee (D), Steve Jarvis (R)

North Carolina Senate District 30: ForecastNorth Carolina Senate 27: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+22North Carolina Senate 29: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+38North Carolina Senate 31: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+23North Carolina Senate 32: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+40North Carolina Senate 33: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+41North Carolina Senate 36: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+59North Carolina Senate 37: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+27North Carolina Senate District 30: Forecast3227373133362930
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 30 is safe Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 5 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+56 to R+33, middle R+45
CandidatesPamela D. McAfee (D), Steve Jarvis (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberSteve Jarvis

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+49
President 2024R+47
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNorth Carolina
Median household income$64,692$69,904
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)22%35%
Median age4339
White (not Hispanic)78%61%
Black8%20%
Hispanic8%11%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad6%9%
Jobs in manufacturing18%12%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.