Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › North Carolina House

North Carolina House District 51

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

No Democrat running: counted Republican · Charles M. Taylor (R), April Montgomery (independent)

North Carolina House District 51: No Democrat running: counted RepublicanNorth Carolina House 42: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+47North Carolina House 48: chance of a Democratic win 90%; 2024 president D+1North Carolina House 52: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+23North Carolina House 54: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+9North Carolina House 6: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+23North Carolina House 78: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+49North Carolina House District 51: No Democrat running: counted Republican4265248547851
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 51 is safe Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 3 favour Republicans.

StatusNo Democrat running: counted Republican
CandidatesCharles M. Taylor (R), April Montgomery (independent)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberJohn Sauls

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+29
President 2024R+22
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNorth Carolina
Median household income$64,736$69,904
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)23%35%
Median age4039
White (not Hispanic)61%61%
Black16%20%
Hispanic18%11%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad8%9%
Jobs in manufacturing17%12%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.