Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › North Carolina House

North Carolina House District 36

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

98% chance of a Democratic win · Julie von Haefen (D), Mary Insprucker (R)

North Carolina House District 36: ForecastNorth Carolina House 11: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+27North Carolina House 21: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+25North Carolina House 33: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+33North Carolina House 37: chance of a Democratic win 25%; 2024 president D+20North Carolina House District 36: Forecast1121333736
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 36 is safe Democratic. Of its 4 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win98%
Likely margin (80% range)D+8 to D+30, middle D+19
CandidatesJulie von Haefen (D), Mary Insprucker (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberJulie von Haefen

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+12
President 2024D+22
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNorth Carolina
Median household income$138,962$69,904
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)68%35%
Median age3739
White (not Hispanic)66%61%
Black8%20%
Hispanic7%11%
Asian13%3%
Born abroad15%9%
Jobs in manufacturing10%12%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.