Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › North Carolina House

North Carolina House District 32

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

83% chance of a Democratic win · Bryan K. Cohn (D), Frank Sossamon (R)

North Carolina House District 32: ForecastNorth Carolina House 2: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+21North Carolina House 27: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+17North Carolina House 35: chance of a Democratic win 36%; 2024 president D+19North Carolina House 7: chance of a Democratic win 17%; 2024 president R+13Virginia lower 49: no election in 2026Virginia lower 50: no election in 2026North Carolina House District 32: Forecast3527VA 4927VA 5032
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 32 leans Democratic. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans, 1 is competitive, 2 have no 2026 forecast. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win83%
Likely margin (80% range)R+3 to D+20, middle D+8
CandidatesBryan K. Cohn (D), Frank Sossamon (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberBryan Cohn

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+1
President 2024even
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNorth Carolina
Median household income$54,200$69,904
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)19%35%
Median age4239
White (not Hispanic)44%61%
Black41%20%
Hispanic11%11%
Asian0%3%
Born abroad6%9%
Jobs in manufacturing14%12%
Jobs in farming or mining2%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.