Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › North Carolina House

North Carolina House District 113

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · John Morgan (D), Jake Johnson (R)

North Carolina House District 113: ForecastNorth Carolina House 111: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+48North Carolina House 114: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+18North Carolina House 117: chance of a Democratic win 12%; 2024 president R+12North Carolina House 119: chance of a Democratic win 13%; 2024 president R+13North Carolina House 85: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+47South Carolina House 17: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+54South Carolina House 38: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+63North Carolina House District 113: ForecastSC 38117114SC 1711185119113
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 113 is safe Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 6 favour Republicans. 2 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+42 to R+19, middle R+30
CandidatesJohn Morgan (D), Jake Johnson (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberJake Johnson

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+33
President 2024R+32
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNorth Carolina
Median household income$55,228$69,904
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)26%35%
Median age4839
White (not Hispanic)79%61%
Black6%20%
Hispanic10%11%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad6%9%
Jobs in manufacturing12%12%
Jobs in farming or mining2%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.