Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › North Carolina House

North Carolina House District 110

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

1% chance of a Democratic win · Caroline Eason (R), Mary Silver (D)

North Carolina House District 110: ForecastNorth Carolina House 108: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+30North Carolina House 109: chance of a Democratic win 5%; 2024 president R+15North Carolina House 111: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+48North Carolina House 86: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+42North Carolina House 97: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+46South Carolina House 47: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+44North Carolina House District 110: Forecast109108SC 479711186110
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 110 is safe Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 6 favour Republicans. 1 of them is across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+37 to R+15, middle R+26
CandidatesCaroline Eason (R), Mary Silver (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberKelly Hastings

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+33
President 2024R+33
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNorth Carolina
Median household income$52,634$69,904
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)17%35%
Median age4139
White (not Hispanic)68%61%
Black20%20%
Hispanic8%11%
Asian0%3%
Born abroad3%9%
Jobs in manufacturing17%12%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.