Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › New York Assembly

New York Assembly District 139

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

2% chance of a Democratic win · Sarah R. Wolcott (D), Stephen M. Hawley (R)

New York Assembly District 139: ForecastNew York Assembly 133: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president D+27New York Assembly 134: chance of a Democratic win 5%; 2024 president D+1New York Assembly 136: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+35New York Assembly 138: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+29New York Assembly 144: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+16New York Assembly 147: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+25New York Assembly District 139: Forecast138134136144147133139
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 139 is safe Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 4 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win2%
Likely margin (80% range)R+64 to R+18, middle R+41
CandidatesSarah R. Wolcott (D), Stephen M. Hawley (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberSteve Hawley

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+54
Governor 2022R+39
Legislature 2024uncontested (R)
President 2024R+24
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNew York
Median household income$70,744$84,578
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)24%40%
Median age4240
White (not Hispanic)87%53%
Black3%14%
Hispanic5%20%
Asian1%9%
Born abroad3%23%
Jobs in manufacturing14%6%
Jobs in farming or mining3%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.