Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › New York Assembly

New York Assembly District 112

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

5% chance of a Democratic win · Mario L. Fantini (D), Mary Beth Walsh (R)

New York Assembly District 112: ForecastNew York Assembly 107: chance of a Democratic win 74%; 2024 president D+24New York Assembly 108: chance of a Democratic win 97%; 2024 president D+8New York Assembly 110: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+20New York Assembly 111: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+5New York Assembly 113: chance of a Democratic win 76%; 2024 president D+8New York Assembly 114: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+16New York Assembly 118: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+36New York Assembly District 112: Forecast110107114118112
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 112 is likely Republican. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win5%
Likely margin (80% range)R+26 to R+3, middle R+14
CandidatesMario L. Fantini (D), Mary Beth Walsh (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberMary Beth Walsh

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+19
Governor 2022R+5
Legislature 2024R+18
President 2024D+4
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtNew York
Median household income$107,582$84,578
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)46%40%
Median age4440
White (not Hispanic)87%53%
Black2%14%
Hispanic4%20%
Asian4%9%
Born abroad7%23%
Jobs in manufacturing10%6%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.