Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Missouri House

Missouri House District 158

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Scott Cupps (R), Chris Foster (D)

Missouri House District 158: ForecastArkansas House 12: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+40Arkansas House 6: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+38Arkansas House 7: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+28Arkansas House 8: chance of a Democratic win 7%; 2024 president R+36Missouri House 138: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+61Missouri House 155: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+67Missouri House 157: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+64Missouri House 159: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+67Missouri House District 158: ForecastAR 7AR 12157AR 6138159155158
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 158 is safe Republican. Of its 8 neighbouring districts, 8 favour Republicans. 4 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+78 to R+55, middle R+66
CandidatesScott Cupps (R), Chris Foster (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberScott Cupps

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022uncontested (R)
Legislature 2024R+70
President 2024R+65
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMissouri
Median household income$55,130$68,920
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)13%32%
Median age4339
White (not Hispanic)82%77%
Black0%11%
Hispanic9%5%
Asian2%2%
Born abroad4%4%
Jobs in manufacturing23%11%
Jobs in farming or mining4%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.