Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Missouri House

Missouri House District 112

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Ed Callahan (R), Dave Rekosh (D)

Missouri House District 112: ForecastMissouri House 111: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+40Missouri House 113: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+33Missouri House 114: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+38Missouri House 95: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+15Missouri House 97: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+31Missouri House District 112: Forecast9511397114111112
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 112 is safe Republican. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 5 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+45 to R+23, middle R+34
CandidatesEd Callahan (R), Dave Rekosh (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberRenee Reuter

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022uncontested (R)
Legislature 2024R+39
President 2024R+36
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMissouri
Median household income$94,364$68,920
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)28%32%
Median age3939
White (not Hispanic)91%77%
Black1%11%
Hispanic3%5%
Asian1%2%
Born abroad2%4%
Jobs in manufacturing12%11%
Jobs in farming or mining1%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.