Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Missouri House

Missouri House District 101

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

10% chance of a Democratic win · Ben Keathley (R), Paul Lentz (D), Jeff Coleman (Libertarian)

Missouri House District 101: ForecastMissouri House 100: chance of a Democratic win 34%; 2024 president D+3Missouri House 102: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+23Missouri House 110: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+18Missouri House 69: chance of a Democratic win 3%; 2024 president R+13Missouri House 87: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+25Missouri House 89: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president R+2Missouri House District 101: Forecast100698987110102101
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 101 is likely Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 5 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win10%
Likely margin (80% range)R+22 to even, middle R+11
CandidatesBen Keathley (R), Paul Lentz (D), Jeff Coleman (Libertarian)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberBen Keathley

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+7
Legislature 2024R+9
President 2024D+4
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMissouri
Median household income$152,890$68,920
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)74%32%
Median age4739
White (not Hispanic)75%77%
Black3%11%
Hispanic4%5%
Asian12%2%
Born abroad16%4%
Jobs in manufacturing11%11%
Jobs in farming or mining1%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.