Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota Senate

Minnesota Senate District 7

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

24% chance of a Democratic win · Kim (Kotonias) McLaughlin (D), Robert Farnsworth (R)

Minnesota Senate District 7: ForecastMinnesota Senate 10: chance of a Democratic win <1%Minnesota Senate 11: chance of a Democratic win 2%Minnesota Senate 2: chance of a Democratic win 3%Minnesota Senate 3: chance of a Democratic win 86%Minnesota Senate 6: chance of a Democratic win 1%Minnesota Senate District 7: Forecast61110237
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 7 leans Republican. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 4 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win24%
Likely margin (80% range)R+17 to D+5, middle R+6
CandidatesKim (Kotonias) McLaughlin (D), Robert Farnsworth (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberRob Farnsworth

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+7
Governor 2022R+4
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$62,620$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)21%39%
Median age4839
White (not Hispanic)92%77%
Black1%7%
Hispanic1%6%
Asian0%5%
Born abroad1%9%
Jobs in manufacturing9%13%
Jobs in farming or mining7%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.