Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota Senate

Minnesota Senate District 64

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

>99% chance of a Democratic win · Robert Bushard (R), Erin Murphy (D)

Minnesota Senate District 64: ForecastMinnesota Senate 51: chance of a Democratic win >99%Minnesota Senate 52: chance of a Democratic win >99%Minnesota Senate 53: chance of a Democratic win 98%Minnesota Senate 63: chance of a Democratic win >99%Minnesota Senate 65: chance of a Democratic win >99%Minnesota Senate 66: chance of a Democratic win >99%Minnesota Senate District 64: Forecast63656651525364
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 64 is safe Democratic. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 6 favour Democrats.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win>99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+59 to D+81, middle D+70
CandidatesRobert Bushard (R), Erin Murphy (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberErin Murphy

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+69
Governor 2022D+71
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$88,284$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)66%39%
Median age3739
White (not Hispanic)78%77%
Black8%7%
Hispanic5%6%
Asian4%5%
Born abroad9%9%
Jobs in manufacturing9%13%
Jobs in farming or mining0%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.