Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota Senate

Minnesota Senate District 34

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

97% chance of a Democratic win · John Hoffman (D), Karen Attia (R)

Minnesota Senate District 34: ForecastMinnesota Senate 30: chance of a Democratic win <1%Minnesota Senate 31: chance of a Democratic win 1%Minnesota Senate 32: chance of a Democratic win 27%Minnesota Senate 35: chance of a Democratic win 49%Minnesota Senate 37: chance of a Democratic win 29%Minnesota Senate 38: chance of a Democratic win >99%Minnesota Senate 39: chance of a Democratic win >99%Minnesota Senate District 34: Forecast3839353237303134
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 34 is safe Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 4 favour Republicans, 1 is competitive.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win97%
Likely margin (80% range)D+6 to D+28, middle D+17
CandidatesJohn Hoffman (D), Karen Attia (R)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberJohn Hoffman

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+10
Governor 2022D+13
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$121,595$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)39%39%
Median age4039
White (not Hispanic)67%77%
Black12%7%
Hispanic4%6%
Asian11%5%
Born abroad13%9%
Jobs in manufacturing19%13%
Jobs in farming or mining0%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.