Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Minnesota House

Minnesota House District 39A

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

>99% chance of a Democratic win · Andy Macko (R), Aaron Klemz (D)

Minnesota House District 39A: ForecastMinnesota House 32B: chance of a Democratic win 87%; 2024 president D+1Minnesota House 34B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+28Minnesota House 38B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+45Minnesota House 39B: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+43Minnesota House 40A: chance of a Democratic win 98%; 2024 president D+28Minnesota House 59A: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+66Minnesota House 60A: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+72Minnesota House District 39A: Forecast59A39B60A38B34B40A32B39A
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 39A is safe Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 7 favour Democrats.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win>99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+17 to D+40, middle D+28
CandidatesAndy Macko (R), Aaron Klemz (D)
Candidate list fromofficial
Current memberErin Koegel

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022D+27
Governor 2022D+30
Legislature 2024D+27
President 2024D+27
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMinnesota
Median household income$78,153$87,556
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)29%39%
Median age3639
White (not Hispanic)57%77%
Black17%7%
Hispanic16%6%
Asian5%5%
Born abroad19%9%
Jobs in manufacturing14%13%
Jobs in farming or mining0%2%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.