Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan Senate

Michigan Senate District 26

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

2% chance of a Democratic win · Brendan J. Johnson (D), Matthew Bierlein (R)

Michigan Senate District 26: ForecastMichigan Senate 24: chance of a Democratic win 1%Michigan Senate 25: chance of a Democratic win <1%Michigan Senate 27: chance of a Democratic win >99%Michigan Senate 28: chance of a Democratic win 97%Michigan Senate 34: chance of a Democratic win <1%Michigan Senate 35: chance of a Democratic win 96%Michigan Senate District 26: Forecast27243528342526
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 26 is safe Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 3 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win2%
Likely margin (80% range)R+30 to R+7, middle R+19
CandidatesBrendan J. Johnson (D), Matthew Bierlein (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberKevin Daley

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2022R+25
Governor 2022R+11
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$66,349$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)19%32%
Median age4440
White (not Hispanic)88%73%
Black3%13%
Hispanic5%6%
Asian0%3%
Born abroad2%7%
Jobs in manufacturing19%18%
Jobs in farming or mining2%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.