Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan House

Michigan House District 85

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Richard Abraham (D), Bradley Slagh (R)

Michigan House District 85: ForecastMichigan House 43: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+42Michigan House 83: chance of a Democratic win 94%; 2024 president D+9Michigan House 84: chance of a Democratic win 93%; 2024 president D+11Michigan House 86: chance of a Democratic win 10%; 2024 president evenMichigan House 88: chance of a Democratic win 8%; 2024 president R+8Michigan House 89: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+34Michigan House District 85: Forecast838689438885
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 85 is safe Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 4 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+48 to R+26, middle R+37
CandidatesRichard Abraham (D), Bradley Slagh (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberBrad Slagh

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+41
President 2024R+34
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$94,666$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)41%32%
Median age3540
White (not Hispanic)88%73%
Black1%13%
Hispanic5%6%
Asian2%3%
Born abroad4%7%
Jobs in manufacturing19%18%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.