Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan House

Michigan House District 81

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

98% chance of a Democratic win · Stephen Wooden (D), Holly DeBoer (R)

Michigan House District 81: ForecastMichigan House 78: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+31Michigan House 80: chance of a Democratic win 97%; 2024 president D+18Michigan House 82: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+52Michigan House 84: chance of a Democratic win 93%; 2024 president D+11Michigan House 90: chance of a Democratic win 2%; 2024 president R+18Michigan House District 81: Forecast828480907881
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 81 is safe Democratic. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 3 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win98%
Likely margin (80% range)D+7 to D+29, middle D+18
CandidatesStephen Wooden (D), Holly DeBoer (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberStephen Wooden

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+11
President 2024D+15
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$84,590$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)49%32%
Median age3740
White (not Hispanic)77%73%
Black8%13%
Hispanic6%6%
Asian3%3%
Born abroad6%7%
Jobs in manufacturing15%18%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.