Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan House

Michigan House District 77

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

99% chance of a Democratic win · Emily Dievendorf (D), Sally Jo Nelton (R)

Michigan House District 77: ForecastMichigan House 73: chance of a Democratic win 96%; 2024 president D+9Michigan House 74: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+34Michigan House 75: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+19Michigan House 76: chance of a Democratic win 91%; 2024 president evenMichigan House 78: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+31Michigan House 93: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+32Michigan House District 77: Forecast74757673789377
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 77 is safe Democratic. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 4 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win99%
Likely margin (80% range)D+15 to D+37, middle D+26
CandidatesEmily Dievendorf (D), Sally Jo Nelton (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberEmily Dievendorf

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+20
President 2024D+23
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$63,652$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)35%32%
Median age3640
White (not Hispanic)69%73%
Black13%13%
Hispanic9%6%
Asian2%3%
Born abroad5%7%
Jobs in manufacturing10%18%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.