Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan House

Michigan House District 62

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

10% chance of a Democratic win · Matthew Smith (D), Alicia St. Germaine (R)

Michigan House District 62: ForecastMichigan House 10: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+37Michigan House 12: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+35Michigan House 13: chance of a Democratic win 92%; 2024 president R+2Michigan House 60: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+23Michigan House 61: chance of a Democratic win 85%; 2024 president R+5Michigan House 63: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+34Michigan House District 62: Forecast12136160106362
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 62 is likely Republican. Of its 6 neighbouring districts, 4 favour Democrats, 2 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win10%
Likely margin (80% range)R+22 to even, middle R+11
CandidatesMatthew Smith (D), Alicia St. Germaine (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberAlicia St. Germaine

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+12
President 2024R+11
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$69,107$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)22%32%
Median age4240
White (not Hispanic)78%73%
Black13%13%
Hispanic3%6%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad4%7%
Jobs in manufacturing18%18%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.