Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan House

Michigan House District 36

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

<1% chance of a Democratic win · Cole Slaski (D), Steve Carra (R)

Michigan House District 36: ForecastIndiana House 48: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president R+29Indiana House 49: chance of a Democratic win 4%; 2024 president R+30Indiana House 5: chance of a Democratic win 15%; 2024 president R+10Indiana House 51: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+48Michigan House 35: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+48Michigan House 37: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+23Michigan House 39: chance of a Democratic win 1%; 2024 president R+24Michigan House 42: chance of a Democratic win 6%; 2024 president R+9Michigan House 45: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+35Michigan House District 36: ForecastIN 48IN 494237IN 5139453536
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 36 is safe Republican. Of its 9 neighbouring districts, 9 favour Republicans. 4 of them are across the state line.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win<1%
Likely margin (80% range)R+44 to R+22, middle R+33
CandidatesCole Slaski (D), Steve Carra (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberSteve Carra

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+37
President 2024R+35
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$66,201$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)19%32%
Median age4240
White (not Hispanic)85%73%
Black3%13%
Hispanic7%6%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad4%7%
Jobs in manufacturing34%18%
Jobs in farming or mining3%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.