Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan House

Michigan House District 27

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

31% chance of a Democratic win · Jaime Churches (D), Rylee Linting (R)

Michigan House District 27: ForecastMichigan House 1: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+60Michigan House 2: chance of a Democratic win 93%; 2024 president D+2Michigan House 28: chance of a Democratic win 17%; 2024 president R+13Michigan House District 27: Forecast212827
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 27 leans Republican. Of its 3 neighbouring districts, 2 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win31%
Likely margin (80% range)R+15 to D+7, middle R+4
CandidatesJaime Churches (D), Rylee Linting (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberRylee Linting

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+4
President 2024R+9
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$75,009$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)26%32%
Median age4440
White (not Hispanic)83%73%
Black4%13%
Hispanic8%6%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad4%7%
Jobs in manufacturing17%18%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.