Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan House

Michigan House District 15

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

95% chance of a Democratic win · Jalal Abdallah (D), Hassan H. Nehme (R)

Michigan House District 15: ForecastMichigan House 16: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+52Michigan House 2: chance of a Democratic win 93%; 2024 president D+2Michigan House 25: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+14Michigan House 26: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president D+26Michigan House 29: chance of a Democratic win 15%; 2024 president R+13Michigan House 3: chance of a Democratic win >99%; 2024 president R+9Michigan House 4: chance of a Democratic win 99%; 2024 president D+87Michigan House District 15: Forecast4231625262915
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 15 is safe Democratic. Of its 7 neighbouring districts, 6 favour Democrats, 1 favours Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win95%
Likely margin (80% range)D+4 to D+26, middle D+15
CandidatesJalal Abdallah (D), Hassan H. Nehme (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberErin Byrnes

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024D+13
President 2024R+2
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$71,170$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)32%32%
Median age3640
White (not Hispanic)84%73%
Black6%13%
Hispanic5%6%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad20%7%
Jobs in manufacturing16%18%
Jobs in farming or mining0%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.