Election forecasts you can inspect.Tested models, shown with their sources and their uncertainty.

Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

State legislatures › Michigan House

Michigan House District 107

2026 forecast · Updated October 22, 2026, 09:28 UTC

2% chance of a Democratic win · Melissa Perron (D), Parker Fairbairn (R)

Michigan House District 107: ForecastMichigan House 103: chance of a Democratic win 91%; 2024 president D+7Michigan House 104: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+26Michigan House 105: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+39Michigan House 106: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+34Michigan House 108: chance of a Democratic win <1%; 2024 president R+33Michigan House District 107: Forecast104103105106108107
Safe DLean DToss-upLean RSafe RHatched: not up in 2026 (shaded by holder) · dashed: other state

District 107 is safe Republican. Of its 5 neighbouring districts, 1 favours Democrats, 4 favour Republicans.

StatusForecast
Chance of a Democratic win2%
Likely margin (80% range)R+31 to R+8, middle R+19
CandidatesMelissa Perron (D), Parker Fairbairn (R)
Candidate list fromaggregator (The Ballot Brief)
Current memberParker Fairbairn

How it has voted

On its current lines. Legislative contests and the top-of-ticket vote inside the district.

Legislature 2024R+21
President 2024R+16
← RepublicanDemocratic →

Who lives here

Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2019-2023.

This districtMichigan
Median household income$68,899$71,149
Bachelor's degree or more (25+)33%32%
Median age4640
White (not Hispanic)84%73%
Black1%13%
Hispanic2%6%
Asian1%3%
Born abroad3%7%
Jobs in manufacturing12%18%
Jobs in farming or mining1%1%

Initial version. This model was tested on every state legislative election from 1994 to 2024 before publication, forecasting each as if it had not happened. It beat the simple rule “the party that holds the seat keeps it”, and its chamber seat counts were off by 2.9 seats on average (target: under 3). Districts with no two-party race last time are read from their own presidential vote, a change tested in advance that cut their average error from 17 to 13 points. It missed one of its five accuracy targets: in 2024, the calmest year on record, its ranges were wider than they needed to be (92% of results fell inside its 80% ranges; target: at most 88%). Treat the ranges as cautious. The full test record and code.